PsycEXTRA Dataset 1902
DOI: 10.1037/e533602009-219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstracts of general addresses [Dr. Michael E. Sadler]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The summed radio luminosity function of all radio sources, together with its separation into starforming galaxies and radio-loud AGN, is provided in Table 2 and shown in Fig. 3, and these are in excellent agreement with previous determinations (Machalski & Godlowski 2000;Sadler et al 2002;Best et al 2005a;Mauch & Sadler 2007). Uncertainties quoted are the statistical Poissonian errors only; at some luminosities these are so small that they will be underestimates, with systematic errors dominating.…”
Section: Local Radio Luminosity Functions Of Hergs and Lergssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The summed radio luminosity function of all radio sources, together with its separation into starforming galaxies and radio-loud AGN, is provided in Table 2 and shown in Fig. 3, and these are in excellent agreement with previous determinations (Machalski & Godlowski 2000;Sadler et al 2002;Best et al 2005a;Mauch & Sadler 2007). Uncertainties quoted are the statistical Poissonian errors only; at some luminosities these are so small that they will be underestimates, with systematic errors dominating.…”
Section: Local Radio Luminosity Functions Of Hergs and Lergssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…3 shows the radio luminosity functions derived for starforming galaxies and radio-loud AGN. The smooth nature of the derived luminosity functions, especially at low and high luminosities where small numbers of misclassifications would have pronounced effects, offers broad support to the success of the classification scheme, as does the comparison with previous determinations from Machalski & Godlowski (2000), Sadler et al (2002) and Mauch & Sadler (2007). The slight offset of the AGN line from previous determinations below a radio luminosity of L ≈ 10 23 W Hz −1 may be caused by the different classification of radio-quiet AGN, which here are classified along with the star-forming galaxies.…”
Section: A2 Combination Into a Final Classificationsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that hotter, perhaps more AGN‐rich galaxies, are represented in this more luminous, partially radio‐selected sample. A similar sample of approximately 40 luminous southern galaxies, with radio images from the Molonglo telescope and redshifts from the 2dF multi‐object spectrograph has recently been compiled by Sadler et al (2002), and could be analysed in a similar way. Our understanding of the LT relation would be much improved if submm fluxes could be determined for these galaxies with known moderate redshifts and radio and far‐IR flux densities.…”
Section: Photometric Redshiftsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the dusty sub‐sample, the observed mean radio emission is likely associated with starburst activity (e.g. LIGs; Sadler et al 2002). Assuming this is the case, the mean radio luminosity of the dusty sub‐population corresponds to an average SFR (0.1–100 M ⊙ ) ≈ 25 M ⊙ yr −1 , adopting the calibration of Bell (2003).…”
Section: Radio Stackingmentioning
confidence: 99%