2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108884
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance and Size of Gulf Shrimp in Louisiana's Coastal Estuaries following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill

Abstract: The Deepwater Horizon oil spill impacted Louisiana's coastal estuaries physically, chemically, and biologically. To better understand the ecological consequences of this oil spill on Louisiana estuaries, we compared the abundance and size of two Gulf shrimp species (Farfantepeneus aztecus and Litopeneus setiferus) in heavily affected and relatively unaffected estuaries, before and after the oil spill. Two datasets were used to conduct this study: data on shrimp abundance and size before the spill were availabl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, numerous exposure studies on small coastal fishes (primarily Fundulus grandis) suggest negative impacts on an individual level [43,44,45], however field observations from coastal habitats suggest fish population abundances were stable, or in some instances greater, after the oil spill [42,46]. There is also evidence to suggest that commercially important shrimp species (Farfantepeneus aztecus and Litopeneus setiferus) from impacted areas increased in abundance after the spill, and mean size of shrimp was unchanged, even though previous lab studies suggest decapods are negatively impacted by contaminants present in oil [47]. Compensatory processes and complex interactions in marine ecosystems may lessen the overall impact of large disturbances at a population level [42], however as in the case of Pacific herring following the Exxon Valdez spill, latent effects may exist within populations, therefore continued biological monitoring in northern Gulf of Mexico ecosystem is advisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, numerous exposure studies on small coastal fishes (primarily Fundulus grandis) suggest negative impacts on an individual level [43,44,45], however field observations from coastal habitats suggest fish population abundances were stable, or in some instances greater, after the oil spill [42,46]. There is also evidence to suggest that commercially important shrimp species (Farfantepeneus aztecus and Litopeneus setiferus) from impacted areas increased in abundance after the spill, and mean size of shrimp was unchanged, even though previous lab studies suggest decapods are negatively impacted by contaminants present in oil [47]. Compensatory processes and complex interactions in marine ecosystems may lessen the overall impact of large disturbances at a population level [42], however as in the case of Pacific herring following the Exxon Valdez spill, latent effects may exist within populations, therefore continued biological monitoring in northern Gulf of Mexico ecosystem is advisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This study shows that the concentrations of oil released and dispersant used during the DWH event could have negatively affected penaeid shrimp in the GOM, whether through altered behavioral responses, delayed development, or mortality. Even though the spill occurred during the spring spawning season and likely affected shrimp larvae at select locations, GOM shrimp populations as a whole do not appear to have been affected long term, perhaps in part due to fishery closures that were put in place following the spill [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the spill occurred during the spring spawning season and likely affected shrimp larvae at select locations, GOM shrimp populations as a whole do not appear to have been affected long term, perhaps in part due to fishery closures that were put in place following the spill [69].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%