No abstract

This study examines the trophic status and relationships of coral reef fish in the lagoon of New Caledonia, southwest pacific. The feeding habits of 34 fish species collected at three contrasted sites were first described using a compilation of gut contents observations and data from the literature. The carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures of these fish and of some of their potential ultimate food sources were also determined at each site. Despite some spatial variations in the isotopic signatures of most food sources and fish trophic groups, the overall trophic structures of fish assemblages were similar at the three sites. Stable isotope data were then used to re-assign fish species to trophic groups based on the δ 15 N signatures of fish and their food sources. Herbivorous fish species were clearly distinguished from the other trophic groups by their lower δ 15 N signatures, consistent with an estimated trophic position of ∼2 for all species examined. Scaridae were however characterized by relatively higher δ 13 C and lower δ 15 N, which is probably linked with the role of detritus in their diet. The estimated trophic positions of planktivorous fish species were consistent with their gut contents-based classification. Conversely, the isotopic signatures of carnivorous and piscivorous fish species largely overlapped, and their estimated trophic positions were much lower than expected. This suggests that these species feed over a broader range of trophic levels and food sources than implied by the gut contents observations, and indicates that their diet is partly omnivorous. Finally, the relationships between body mass and the isotopic signatures of four fish species were significant for at least one isotopic ratio for each species. Since ontogenetic variations and omnivorous diets are difficult to assess with gut contents data only, stable isotopes revealed essential in estimating the actual trophic status and relationships characterizing the fish species under study.

Parts of coral reefs from New Caledonia (South Pacific) were registered at the UNESCO World Heritage list in 2008. Management strategies aiming at preserving the exceptional ecological value of these reefs in the context of climate change are currently being considered. This study evaluates the appropriateness of an exclusive fishing ban of herbivorous fish as a strategy to enhance coral reef resilience to hurricanes and bleaching in the UNESCO-registered areas of New Caledonia. A two-phase approach was developed: 1) coral, macroalgal, and herbivorous fish communities were examined in four biotopes from 14 reefs submitted to different fishing pressures in New Caledonia, and 2) results from these analyses were challenged in the context of a global synthesis of the relationship between herbivorous fish protection, coral recovery and relative macroalgal development after hurricanes and bleaching. Analyses of New Caledonia data indicated that 1) current fishing pressure only slightly affected herbivorous fish communities in the country, and 2) coral and macroalgal covers remained unrelated, and macroalgal cover was not related to the biomass, density or diversity of macroalgae feeders, whatever the biotope or level of fishing pressure considered. At a global scale, we found no relationship between reef protection status, coral recovery and relative macroalgal development after major climatic events. These results suggest that an exclusive protection of herbivorous fish in New Caledonia is unlikely to improve coral reef resilience to large-scale climatic disturbances, especially in the lightly fished UNESCO-registered areas. More efforts towards the survey and regulation of major chronic stress factors such as mining are rather recommended. In the most heavily fished areas of the country, carnivorous fish and large targeted herbivores may however be monitored as part of a precautionary approach.

Phytoplanktonic communities maintain a high diversity in a seemingly homogeneous environment, competing for the same set of resources. Many theories have been proposed to explain this coexistence despite likely competition, such as contrasted responses to temporal environmental variation. However, theory has developed at a faster pace than empirical evaluation using field data, which requires inferring drivers of community dynamics from observational time series. Here, we combine autoregressive models with a data set spanning more than 20 years of phytoplankton counts every two weeks, together with nutrients and physical variables. By comparing models dominated by nutrients or physical variables (hydrodynamics and climate), we first explore which abiotic factors contribute more to phytoplankton growth and decline. We find that physical drivers – such as irradiance, wind, and salinity – explain some of the variability in abundances unexplained by biotic interactions. In contrast, responses to nutrients explain less of the phytoplankton variability. Concerning biotic drivers of community dynamics, multivariate autoregressive models reveal that competition between different groups (genera) has a much weaker effect on population growth rates than competition within a group. In fact, the few biotic interactions between genera that are detected are frequently positive. Hence, our system is unlikely to be best represented as a set of competitors whose differing responses to fluctuating environments allow coexistence, as in ‘paradox of the plankton’ models with a storage effect or a relative nonlinearity of competition. Coexistence is more likely to result from high intragroup density‐dependence. Competition between phytoplanktonic groups and nutrient limitation are often invoked as drivers of phytoplankton dynamics; our findings suggest instead that more attention should be given to the physical structure of the environment and natural enemies such as grazers and pathogens, that could explain the high intraspecific density dependence found here.