2008
DOI: 10.1080/00063650809461536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abundance of male Black GrouseTetrao tetrixin Britain in 2005, and change since 1995–96

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To account for the fact that this resulted in 2 different trend estimates for some species, models were constructed within a mixed model framework, using the Mixed procedure in SAS v. 9.1 (SAS Institute 2003), with species specified as a random effect, and applying the Kenward-Rogers correction to the degrees of freedom (Littell et al 1996). Unbiased estimate of change from national survey (Sim et al 2008) c Estimated change from national survey, although biases in initial site selection mean this may not fully reflect the national trend (Whitfield 2002) d Estimated decline in Fetlar and Unst (Shetland, UK) stronghold, representing about 40% of the national total (Grant unpubl. data) e Reanalysis of data from national survey to estimate minimum population change between Gibbons et al (1993) and Wotton et al (2002) Sim et al 2005) is derived from the proportion of surveyed regions in which populations increased by > 25% compared with the proportion that decreased by > 25%, and ranges from -1 (widespread decline) to 1 (widespread increase).…”
Section: Relationship Between Diet and Upland Bird Population Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To account for the fact that this resulted in 2 different trend estimates for some species, models were constructed within a mixed model framework, using the Mixed procedure in SAS v. 9.1 (SAS Institute 2003), with species specified as a random effect, and applying the Kenward-Rogers correction to the degrees of freedom (Littell et al 1996). Unbiased estimate of change from national survey (Sim et al 2008) c Estimated change from national survey, although biases in initial site selection mean this may not fully reflect the national trend (Whitfield 2002) d Estimated decline in Fetlar and Unst (Shetland, UK) stronghold, representing about 40% of the national total (Grant unpubl. data) e Reanalysis of data from national survey to estimate minimum population change between Gibbons et al (1993) and Wotton et al (2002) Sim et al 2005) is derived from the proportion of surveyed regions in which populations increased by > 25% compared with the proportion that decreased by > 25%, and ranges from -1 (widespread decline) to 1 (widespread increase).…”
Section: Relationship Between Diet and Upland Bird Population Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species with significant populations in lowland habitats (above) were excluded to avoid trends that are unrepresentative of upland areas. As this yielded only 6 species (golden plover, snipe, curlew, meadow pipit, wheatear and ring ouzel), an equivalent change index was also calculated from the regional breakdown presented in the national surveys of black grouse (Sim et al 2008) and dotterel (Whitfield 2002). Change score was positively correlated with national trend (change score = -0.12 + 0.80 × national trend; r = 0.71, n = 8, p = 0.047); the slope was unchanged when data from black grouse and dotterel were excluded.…”
Section: Relationship Between Diet and Upland Bird Population Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.). The black grouse's decline in this part of Poland and Slovakia parallels that recorded in almost the whole of this species' European range of distribution (Baines and Hudson 1995;Ludwig et al 2008;Sim et al 2008). The reasons for this decline in black grouse numbers in the studied population are not fully understood.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Firstly, due to the fact that the British black grouse populations have declined during the period of the study. The last national survey in 2005 found black grouse in Britain, especially in southern Scotland, were still in decline (Sim et al 2008). Secondly, because small leks seem more susceptible to change (Geary et al 2012) and therefore a change in black grouse numbers would first be expected at the leks with observed low numbers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%