2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00006.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abutment Rotational Displacement of External Hexagon Implant System Under Lateral Cyclic Loading

Abstract: Within the limits of this in vitro study, the RD of the external hexagon joint components occurred significantly under eccentric lateral loading when compared to centric loading. The displacement increased significantly with longer period of eccentric lateral loading.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
10

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
8
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In the oral cavity they have to resist dynamic forces [3][4][5][6] and morse taper (conical) implant-abutment connections (IAC) have proven to be more fatigue resistant to mechanical loading [1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12]. Nevertheless technical failures like veneer chipping orfracture, screw-or abutment loosening as well as implant fractures have been reported amounting up to 30-41% within 5 years [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the oral cavity they have to resist dynamic forces [3][4][5][6] and morse taper (conical) implant-abutment connections (IAC) have proven to be more fatigue resistant to mechanical loading [1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12]. Nevertheless technical failures like veneer chipping orfracture, screw-or abutment loosening as well as implant fractures have been reported amounting up to 30-41% within 5 years [13][14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reports by Steinebrunner et al (2005) indicate that bacterial penetration between implants and abutments connected by screws varies according to the number of loading cycles applied to the abutment. The leakage of microorganisms and fluids to the inner parts of the implants is considerably increased by load application, which generates micro-movements and interfacial gaps (Khraisat et al, 2006). Bacterial species harboring the internal surfaces of the implants and components is not surprising, since the size of oral bacterial species ranges in average from 1.1 to 1.5 µm in length and 2 to 6 µm in diameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number, shape, and size of the gaps may vary according to the implant systems and types of platform connection (Khraisat et al 2006;Assunc ßão et al 2009). Commonly, interface designs of screw-retained connections can be classified as external or internal connections, and can incorporate features to rotational resistance, indexing, lateral stabilization, and other mechanisms to minimize the risk of movements and screw loosening.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%