2012
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ac/Ds-transposon activation tagging in poplar: a powerful tool for gene discovery

Abstract: BackgroundRapid improvements in the development of new sequencing technologies have led to the availability of genome sequences of more than 300 organisms today. Thanks to bioinformatic analyses, prediction of gene models and protein-coding transcripts has become feasible. Various reverse and forward genetics strategies have been followed to determine the functions of these gene models and regulatory sequences. Using T-DNA or transposons as tags, significant progress has been made by using "Knock-in" approache… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mutant populations have been produced using the maize Activator (Ac)/Dissociator (Ds) system in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Kuromori et al, 2004), rice (Oryza sativa; Qu et al, 2008), and poplar (Populus spp. ; Fladung and Polak, 2012) and the Enhancer-Inhibitor/ Supressor-mutator system for forward and reverse genetics in Arabidopsis (Speulman et al, 1999(Speulman et al, , 2000 and rice (Kumar et al, 2005;Krishnan et al, 2009). Use of the Ac/Ds system enables the recovery of many independent mutants from a single transformed line and facilitates the rapid identification of putatively mutagenized sequences through the isolation of Ds insertion flanking regions (Kuromori et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mutant populations have been produced using the maize Activator (Ac)/Dissociator (Ds) system in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Kuromori et al, 2004), rice (Oryza sativa; Qu et al, 2008), and poplar (Populus spp. ; Fladung and Polak, 2012) and the Enhancer-Inhibitor/ Supressor-mutator system for forward and reverse genetics in Arabidopsis (Speulman et al, 1999(Speulman et al, , 2000 and rice (Kumar et al, 2005;Krishnan et al, 2009). Use of the Ac/Ds system enables the recovery of many independent mutants from a single transformed line and facilitates the rapid identification of putatively mutagenized sequences through the isolation of Ds insertion flanking regions (Kuromori et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modified Suzuki et al (2001) construct (transposase-deficient) was co-transformed with a plasmid containing transposase controlled by the Glycine max L. (soybean) heat shock promoter to control transposition. In this system, a gain-of-function mutation frequency of 1% was achieved (Fladung and Polak, 2012).…”
Section: Transposon-based Taggingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Both genes were demonstrated to be active before transposition, and inactive after (Suzuki et al, 2001). Fladung and Polak (2012) modified the Suzuki et al (2001) system by incorporating an inducible transposase gene to generate a mutant population in the perennial aspen-Populus hybrid (P. tremula L. £ P. tremuloides Michx.). The modified Suzuki et al (2001) construct (transposase-deficient) was co-transformed with a plasmid containing transposase controlled by the Glycine max L. (soybean) heat shock promoter to control transposition.…”
Section: Transposon-based Taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal is to develop a transposon-based activation tagging system that overcomes these limitations. Activation tags designed around the Activator (Ac)/Dissociation (Ds) (Wilson et al, 1996;Schaffer et al, 1998;Fridborg et al, 1999;Suzuki et al, 2001;Fladung and Polak, 2012) and Enhancer/Suppressor (Marsch-Martínez, 2011) transposon systems engineered with constitutive promotors or enhancer sequences clearly demonstrate that modified transposons retain their mobility and also induce gene expression. These approaches have been used to clone a variety of genes including TINY (Wilson et al, 1996), LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (Schaffer et al, 1998), SHORT INTERNODES (Fridborg et al, 1999), high phenolic compound1-1 Dominant (Schneider et al, 2005), and a strictosidine synthase (Mathieu et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%