2013
DOI: 10.1104/pp.113.213876
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An ActiveAc/DsTransposon System for Activation Tagging in Tomato Cultivar M82 Using Clonal Propagation    

Abstract: Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is a model organism for Solanaceae in both molecular and agronomic research. This project utilized Agrobacterium tumefaciens transformation and the transposon-tagging construct Activator (Ac)/Dissociator (Ds)-ATag-Bar_gosGFP to produce activation-tagged and knockout mutants in the processing tomato cultivar M82. The construct carried hygromycin resistance (hyg), green fluorescent protein (GFP), and the transposase (TPase) of maize (Zea mays) Activator major transcript X054214.1 on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, numerous T-DNA mutant collections have been developed in Arabidopsis (Alonso et al, 2003;Campisi et al, 1999;Feldmann, 1991;Krysan et al, 1999;Qin et al, 2003;Sessions et al, 2002) and other crops like rice (Hsing et al, 2007;Jeon et al, 2000;Jeong et al, 2002;Wan et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2003). In tomato, two activation tagging collections have been generated in the cultivars Micro-Tom (Mathews et al, 2003), a dwarf genotype bearing several mutations affecting plant development (Carvalho et al, 2011;Mart ı et al, 2006), and M82 (Carter et al, 2013), a processing tomato variety with determinate growth habit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, numerous T-DNA mutant collections have been developed in Arabidopsis (Alonso et al, 2003;Campisi et al, 1999;Feldmann, 1991;Krysan et al, 1999;Qin et al, 2003;Sessions et al, 2002) and other crops like rice (Hsing et al, 2007;Jeon et al, 2000;Jeong et al, 2002;Wan et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2003). In tomato, two activation tagging collections have been generated in the cultivars Micro-Tom (Mathews et al, 2003), a dwarf genotype bearing several mutations affecting plant development (Carvalho et al, 2011;Mart ı et al, 2006), and M82 (Carter et al, 2013), a processing tomato variety with determinate growth habit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system uses tetramer copies of cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35 S enhancers 15 and the enhancers upon integration in the recipient plant genome can function in either orientation at the place of insertion, thereby causing transcriptional activation of nearby genes resulting in dominant gain-of-function mutations 16 . There are several reports citing this technique with the development of AT lines in Arabidopsis 17 , 18 , japonica rice 16 , 19 , indica rice 20 , tomato 21 , 22 , poplar 23 , strawberry, potato 24 , barley 25 and sorghum 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In plants, the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) T-DNA insertion lines (Berardini et al, 2015), as well as transposon collections in maize (Zea mays;McCarty et al, 2005) and Medicago truncatula (Tadege et al, 2008) and TILLING populations in wheat (Triticum aestivum; http://www.wheat-tilling.com), are powerful resources, provided an insertion or point mutation has been identified in the gene(s) of interest. In tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), several mutagenized populations are available derived from fast-neutron, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), TILLING, and transposontagging approaches (Menda et al, 2004;Minoia et al, 2010;Saito et al, 2011;Carter et al, 2013). In cases where mutants are not readily available, researchers may rely on transitive or stable gene-silencing approaches to study genes of interest (Smith et al, 2000;Burch-Smith et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%