2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsis.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic agility in digital innovation research: The case of mobile ICT publications within information systems 2000–2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As platforms are mashed up into larger digital infrastructures, digital platforms are becoming increasingly complex research objects (Evans and Basole, 2016). The generativity of digital platforms produces exponentially growing app developer ecosystems, thereby creating research objects that are several orders of magnitude larger than any traditional IS system (Sørensen and Landau, 2015). As digital platforms are competing on multiple levels of the technical architecture, for instance the operating system and browser in the mobile domain (Pon et al, 2014), specifying the appropriate unit of analysis is becoming increasingly difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As platforms are mashed up into larger digital infrastructures, digital platforms are becoming increasingly complex research objects (Evans and Basole, 2016). The generativity of digital platforms produces exponentially growing app developer ecosystems, thereby creating research objects that are several orders of magnitude larger than any traditional IS system (Sørensen and Landau, 2015). As digital platforms are competing on multiple levels of the technical architecture, for instance the operating system and browser in the mobile domain (Pon et al, 2014), specifying the appropriate unit of analysis is becoming increasingly difficult.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, connectivity enables new attributes and these include interoperability (e.g., Bharadwaj, El Sawy, Pavlou, and Venkatraman, 2013; Kallinikos et al, 2013; Porter and Heppelmann, 2014, 2015; Yoo et al, 2012), pervasiveness (e.g., Kolb, 2008; Kolb, Caza, and Collins, 2012; Wajcman and Rose, 2011), speed (e.g., Bharadwaj et al, 2013; Lazer and Friedman, 2007; Siggelkow and Rivkin, 2005; Svahn and Henfridsson, 2012), synchronization (e.g., Angwin and Vaara, 2005; Chatterjee, Segars, and Watson, 2006; Overby, 2008; Porter and Heppelmann, 2014), accessibility/transferability (e.g., Cross, Laseter, Parker, and Velasquez, 2006; Kallinikos et al, 2013; Lee and Berente, 2012; Leonardi and Bailey, 2008; Matusik and Mickel, 2011; Mazmanian, 2013; Mazmanian, Orlikowski, and Yates, 2013; Zittrain, 2006, 2008; Zhang, Yoo, Wattal, Zhang, and Kulathinal, 2014), and ubiquity (e.g., Iansiti and Lakhani, 2014; Kolb, 2008; Mardon and Belk, 2018; Sørensen and Landau, 2015; Wajcman and Rose, 2011). 6 Figure 2 provides a succinct visual representation of these properties in a holistic fashion.…”
Section: The Digital Transformation Of Search and Recombination: New mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This burdensome connotation of path dependence became particularly prevalent as Internet usage emerged and became more widespread. By creating new ways of developing, producing, and distributing products and services (Fichman et al, 2014;Tilson et al, 2010;Yoo et al, 2012), this sweeping technological change induced the demise of incumbents in many industries, such as the book industry (Nylén & Holmström, 2015), the camera industry (Lucas & Goh, 2009), the computer industry (Fichman et al, 2014), the cell phone industry (Sørensen & Landau, 2015), the music industry (Oestreicher-Singer & Zalmanson, 2013), and the newspaper industry (Karimi & Walter, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%