2014
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.188
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic English Socialization Through Individual Networks of Practice

Abstract: This article introduces the notion of individual network of practice (INoP) as a viable construct for analyzing academic (discourse) socialization in second language (L2) contexts. The authors provide an overview of social practice theories that have informed the development of INoP-community of practice (CoP;Lave & Wenger, 1991;Wenger, 1998) and social network theory (Milroy, 1987)-and review relevant literature on academic discourse socialization and more general L2 learning studies that have used either CoP… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
62
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…How are these positionings related to students’ identities and investments in L2 learning or multilingualism and their future trajectories (Darvin & Norton, )? What social networks and practices are learners embedded in while abroad and which languages (or language varieties) mediate their relationships and interactions (Zappa–Hollman & Duff, )? How do these networks and practices support their language development and other aspects of social participation? What ideologies are associated with SA experiences involving particular pairings of sending/receiving countries and the perceived (relative) status of the languages being learned (e.g., English L1 and Arabic, Russian, or Japanese L2, or vice versa)?…”
Section: Language Socialization Embracing a Multilevel Multilingualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How are these positionings related to students’ identities and investments in L2 learning or multilingualism and their future trajectories (Darvin & Norton, )? What social networks and practices are learners embedded in while abroad and which languages (or language varieties) mediate their relationships and interactions (Zappa–Hollman & Duff, )? How do these networks and practices support their language development and other aspects of social participation? What ideologies are associated with SA experiences involving particular pairings of sending/receiving countries and the perceived (relative) status of the languages being learned (e.g., English L1 and Arabic, Russian, or Japanese L2, or vice versa)?…”
Section: Language Socialization Embracing a Multilevel Multilingualmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the friends are conationals, other NNES students, or domestic native speakers, students benefit from all of these relationships (Zappa-Hollman & Duff, 2015). By maintaining strong friendships with the classmates they met in the EAP program, the participants felt less isolated when they entered their disciplinary courses.…”
Section: Experiences In Disciplinary Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, the construct has become contested among other reasons because of its inability to capture adequately powerful social relationships outside the community, with individual networks of practice being suggested instead in order to describe people's engagement with other users and learners of language (cf. Zappa–Hollman & Duff, ). Norm and choice , identity and agency are other important constructs.…”
Section: The Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While their understandings are to a great extent shaped by larger social institutional expectations, they, as individual agents, also play a vital role in shaping them. In these ways, not only identity and participation in real and imagined communities involving the L2 but also agency may dramatically affect learners' L2 trajectories (Duff, 2012;Duff & Doherty, 2015;Zappa-Hollman & Duff, 2015).…”
Section: Agency and Transformative Power Are Means And Goals For Langmentioning
confidence: 99%