Academic Gender Disparity in Orthopedic Surgery in Canadian Universities

Abstract

Introduction Academic medicine is notorious for being "male-dominated." We hypothesized that there were significant and quantifiable levels of gender disparity in academic orthopedic surgery, and this article attempts to quantify the extent of the existing disparity. Also, we examined the research productivity of academic faculty in orthopedic surgery and its correlation with academic ranks and leadership positions. Methods Our study design was cross-sectional in nature. We searched the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS) to compile a list of medical schools that offer orthopedic surgery training for residency. A total of 713 academic orthopedic surgeons met our inclusion criteria. Of the 713 orthopedic surgeons, 518 had an H-index score available on Elsevier's Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands). The gender, academic rank, leadership position, and H-index were compared. Data analysis was done with Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS; IBM, Armonk, NY). The binomial negative regression was used to compare the average H-index between men and women at each rank. Results Our study results reveal that academic orthopedic surgery in Canada is male-dominated, with men holding 87% of the academic positions. Female academic orthopedic surgeons held lower academic ranks, such as assistant professor or lecturer. Women orthopedic surgeons had lower H-index scores compared to their counterparts in ranks above the assistant professor. Our findings imply that research productivity and the ratio of average H-index scores comparing men to women (HM/HF) grow larger with each academic rank. At a 90% confidence level, women were less likely to hold leadership positions than men at an odds ratio (OR) of 0.52 [90% confidence interval (CI): 0.29-0.925, p: 0.03]. There were no significant differences in Hindex between men and women for departmental leadership positions. Conclusion Women were underrepresented in number, rank, and academic productivity (H-index). We offer possible factors that may have contributed to this finding as well as potential solutions.

Academic, Leadership, and Demographic Characteristics of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Division Chiefs in the United States

“… 16 Sex disparities in orthopaedic exist, where women are underrepresented in number, rank, and academic productivity. 17 Our result showed that DCs in orthopaedic sports medicine consists of only 4% women and 14% minorities (1% Hispanic/Latino, 1% African American, 1% mixed, and 11% Asians). Improving the overall diversity of the profession will bring many positive changes, such as promoting innovation through the diversity of ideas and backgrounds.…”

Glass ceiling or murky waters: The gendered and racialized pathway to full professorship in Canada

“…Similarly, Wise and colleagues (2004) found that women were less likely to be promoted to full professor in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Similar results were found in Canadian psychology departments (Carleton et al, 2012), orthopedic surgery (Yue & Khosa, 2020), and among general surgeons (Gawad et al, 2020). Gawad and colleagues (2020) found that even after controlling for years worked, training as well as research productivity, female surgeons were still less likely to be full professors.…”

Sex Disparity Among Canadian Cardiologists in Academic Medicine: Differences in Scholarly Productivity and Academic Rank

“…The H-index takes items into account, such as number of publications and citations [ 23 ]. The H-index has been positively correlated with academic rank across multiple specialties [ 2 , 6 , 21 ]. H-index was used in this study as a method of quantitating academic output and impact.…”

“…Women in academic medicine are less likely to participate in research, have lower salaries [ 4 ], and report less professional satisfaction in academic practice [ 1 ]. Recent publications have also documented that women are underrepresented in senior academic ranks and leadership positions in academic disciplines [ 5 , 6 ], professional societies [ 7 ], and editorial boards of medical journals [ 8 ]. Fewer women advance to the professor rank [ 9 ], and do so at a slower rate [ 10 ].…”