An imperative to develop the social experience of learning has led to the design of informal learning spaces within libraries. Yet little is known about how these spaces are used by students or how students perceive them. Field work in one such space is reported. The general private study practice of undergraduates was captured through audio diaries, while activity in the learning space was directly observed, and students provided reflective perspectives in focus groups and through spot conversations. Results suggest such spaces are popular and yet stimulate limited group work. Yet other, less intense, forms of productive collaboration did occur and a taxonomy of four such types of encounter is offered. Of particular importance to students was access to a 'social ambience' for study. The results encourage institutions to design for a mixed economy of student choice over learning spaces and to consider modes of encouraging diversity in their use.
AMBIENCE IN SOCIAL LEARNING SPACES 2Ambience in social learning: student engagement with new designs for learning spacesAgendas for enriching the experience of formal education often consider refreshing the material design of those spaces in which students learn (Comber & Wall, 2001;Rudd, Morrison & Facer, 2006 Closer scrutiny of arguments for renewing learning spaces suggests that one recurring motive is the ambition to create more favourable conditions for learning that is social (Brown, 2005;Jamieson, Fisher, Gilding, Taylor & Trevitt, 2000). There are at least three arguments for strengthening the collaborative or interpersonal quality of educational practice.The first is promoted by many employers. They may claim that graduates enter the workplace poorly prepared for coordinating their thinking with others (CBI, 2009). This suggests a need for educational environments that support experience in team work. The second argument for extending the 'social' dimension of learning is suggested by young peoples' vigorous engagement with internet-based social media. As so much curricular material is now accessed through the internet, it is natural to consider whether networked social media could also animate communication for learning. Such ambitions would give educational practice a stronger social and 'participative' quality. Then, if learning is made social within the virtual learning spaces of the internet, it is natural to extend such design thinking to the morephysical spaces of the institutional campus: they also might become contexts for cultivating learning through social interaction and collaboration. Finally, the popular call for learning to have a more social quality resonates well with social constructivist theories of knowledge (Berger & Luckman, 1966) and with conceptions of knowing as cognitively and socially 'distributed ' (Clark, 1997). This perspective in turn complements psychological theories that stress the communual contexts of learning (Lave & Wenger, 1990;Rogoff, 2003). In this climate of thinking, educational institutions will consider how th...