2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Academic stress detection on university students during COVID-19 outbreak by using an electronic nose and the galvanic skin response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wearable technology bridges the communication gap between special students and normal students, and also helps them to integrate into society and participate in various activities in life and learning, providing them with a more inclusive educational environment (Díaz et al, 2016; Mehmood & Lee, 2017; Kalist et al, 2020; Nuguri et al, 2021). Instructional staff, including instructors, course designers, or teaching assistants, came in the second (35%) place to assist them in gaining insights about course design and instructional practices (Edwards et al, 2017; Khakurel et al, 2019; Dong & Li, 2021; Acevedo et al, 2021). Teachers can get a clearer picture of student performance and engagement in classroom activities; instructors can adjust teaching strategies based on student learning feedback; and wearable devices can also promote visualized content delivery for training purposes through offering immersive experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wearable technology bridges the communication gap between special students and normal students, and also helps them to integrate into society and participate in various activities in life and learning, providing them with a more inclusive educational environment (Díaz et al, 2016; Mehmood & Lee, 2017; Kalist et al, 2020; Nuguri et al, 2021). Instructional staff, including instructors, course designers, or teaching assistants, came in the second (35%) place to assist them in gaining insights about course design and instructional practices (Edwards et al, 2017; Khakurel et al, 2019; Dong & Li, 2021; Acevedo et al, 2021). Teachers can get a clearer picture of student performance and engagement in classroom activities; instructors can adjust teaching strategies based on student learning feedback; and wearable devices can also promote visualized content delivery for training purposes through offering immersive experiences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of this signal reached an accuracy of more than 90.00% (Castaldo et al, 2019;Melillo et al, 2011) in the classification and identification of stress in the academic setting. However, there is evidence that the GSR signal could be used in conjunction with pattern recognition models for the identification of academic stress with an accuracy more than 95.00% (Durán Acevedo et al, 2021a;Rodríguez et al, 2020). New emerging methods, such as rPPG in combination with demographic data or e-nose, achieved an accuracy over 96.00% (Durán-Acevedo et al, 2021b;Morales-Fajardo et al, 2022).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be proposed that the accuracy of the pattern recognition algorithm on stress and anxiety detection lies between these values. It is worth mentioning that while more frequently used features are temporal, frequential, and nonlinear HRV signals in stress detection in academia; statistical measures, which are less complicated to compute, of the GSR signal yield better accuracies; above 95.00% (Durán Acevedo et al, 2021a;Rodríguez et al, 2020;Santos et al, 2011). In addition, GSR sensors are less invasive, given that they are placed on the fingers; all this could indicate the need to explore the potential of the GSR signal in stress and anxiety detection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resnik et al (2013) used direct topic modeling with LDA to generate interpretable, psychologically relevant “topics” that added value in the predictions of clinical assessments. Acevedo et al (2021) used an algorithm to classify academic stress levels during COVID-19.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%