“…Alongside other authors, we consider that this ‘love’ makes the subject more susceptible to control, and to (self) exploitation (Clarke et al, ; Coin, ; Gill, ), and even self‐flagellation (Archer, ), in order to comply with the principle of productive work (Fassa, ) and the strong culture of performance (Thomas & Davies, ). Both quotes contained clear gender implications: the promotion of the figure of a disembodied scientist (Mählck, , p. 65) with no bonds outside science and with no spatial or temporal limits inside science (Davies & Petersen, , p. 95).…”