2019
DOI: 10.1109/tmm.2019.2903722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AccAnn: A New Subjective Assessment Methodology for Measuring Acceptability and Annoyance of Quality of Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fusion process employs a ν-Support Vector machine (ν-SVM) regressor [Cortes and Vapnik (1995)]. VMAF has been evaluated on various video quality databases, and shows improved correlation with subjective scores [Li et al (2016); Zhang et al (2018); Li et al (2019)]. In this work, VMAF has also been employed to determine optimum resolution for each test rate point and sequence, following the procedure described in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fusion process employs a ν-Support Vector machine (ν-SVM) regressor [Cortes and Vapnik (1995)]. VMAF has been evaluated on various video quality databases, and shows improved correlation with subjective scores [Li et al (2016); Zhang et al (2018); Li et al (2019)]. In this work, VMAF has also been employed to determine optimum resolution for each test rate point and sequence, following the procedure described in Section 3.2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, note that work has shown that the concept of "acceptability" contains different levels, and a quality level that is acceptable may not necessarily be enjoyable [30], [31]. This led to the study of the transition between what is acceptable quality and what is not.…”
Section: Towards Measuring Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies [32]- [34] have shown that acceptability could be estimated on the basis of technical parameters such as bitrate, frame rate, and resolution with non-linear regression. This model was further extended [30], [35], and it was shown that acceptability could also be related to high-level quality estimation on the basis of NTIA VQM [23] or VMAF [9]. However, quality is not the only parameter that needs to be considered when considering acceptability.…”
Section: Towards Measuring Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective quality assessment 1) Perception experiment A fully-controlled perception experiment was conducted to obtain a benchmark (i.e., ground truth) for the quality of underwater image enhancement. The experiment followed the guidelines described in [33], [34]. A single-stimulus method was used, in which human subjects were asked to score the overall quality for each stimulus in the absence of any reference.…”
Section: B Database Of Underwater Image Enhancementmentioning
confidence: 99%