2021
DOI: 10.3390/en14040924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration Feature Extraction of Human Body Based on Wearable Devices

Abstract: Wearable devices used for human body monitoring has broad applications in smart home, sports, security and other fields. Wearable devices provide an extremely convenient way to collect a large amount of human motion data. In this paper, the human body acceleration feature extraction method based on wearable devices is studied. Firstly, Butterworth filter is used to filter the data. Then, in order to ensure the extracted feature value more accurately, it is necessary to remove the abnormal data in the source. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimal device location: One of hypotheses to test in this study is that the accuracy of a DL model to classify human activities can vary based on the SWM device's locations on the body. During human activities, different body sites produce different motion data [61], so it may be possible that its accuracy trained using motion data collected from a body site is higher than one trained using motion data from other body sites. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the influence of the device's locations to achieve accurate and reliable fall detection and classification of other activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal device location: One of hypotheses to test in this study is that the accuracy of a DL model to classify human activities can vary based on the SWM device's locations on the body. During human activities, different body sites produce different motion data [61], so it may be possible that its accuracy trained using motion data collected from a body site is higher than one trained using motion data from other body sites. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the influence of the device's locations to achieve accurate and reliable fall detection and classification of other activities.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 1), a x (t), a y (t), a z (t) are the acceleration values in the direction of the X, Y, and Z axes of the 3D coordinate system for the current sampling timestamp, respectively. Since the human body falls or performs some large movements, the SMV will appear at a peak at some point, which is usually a larger value, while the possibility of a fall event is small if the SMV is a small value [25]. Based on this understanding, the fall detection framework proposed in this paper determines whether further inference is needed by setting an SMV threshold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we compute a total of eleven hand-crafted features, as shown in Table 2. Eight of the selected features are proven accurate in previous works, especially in the general classification of human activities [15,33,34,[73][74][75]. These features include min, max, mean, median, SD, variance, kurtosis, and RMS.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that combining similarities measure and personalization can form a personalized model which has a better performance than the cross-subject model and consumes the test subject's data less than the subject-specific models. Moreover, we further enhance the models' performance by combining hand-crafted features with some of the suggested ones from the previous studies [15,33,34]. The hand-crafted features are often specific toward the activities of interest, which the models have to detect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%