Acceleration of Biological Aging and Underestimation of Subjective Age Are Risk Factors for Severe COVID-19

Abstract

In an epidemic, it is important to have methods for reliable and rapid assessment of risk groups for severe forms of the disease for their priority vaccination and for the application of preventive lockdown measures. The aim of this study was to investigate risk factors for severe forms of COVID-19 in adults using indicators of biological and subjective aging. Longitudinal studies evaluated the severity of the disease and the number of cases. Respondents (447) were divided into “working group” and “risk group” (retirees with chronic diseases). During the lockdown period (in mid-2020), accelerated aging was observed in the group of workers (by 3.9–8 years for men and an increase at the tendency level for women). However, the respondents began to feel subjectively younger (by 3.3–7.2 years). In the risk group, there were no deviations from the expected biopsychological aging. The number of cases at the end of 2020 was 31% in workers and 0% in the risk group. Reasonably, the risk group followed the quarantine rules more strictly by 1.5 times. In working men, indicators of relative biological and relative subjective aging (measured in both 2019 and mid-2020) significantly influenced the incidence at the end of 2020. In women, only the indicators obtained in mid-2020 had a significant impact. The relative biological aging of an individual tested in the middle of 2020 had a direct impact on the risk of infection (p < 0.05) and on the probability of death (p < 0.0001). On the contrary, an increase in the relative subjective (psychological) aging index reduced the risk of infection (at the tendency level, p = 0.06) and the risk of death (p < 0.0001). Both the risk of infection and the risk of death increased with calendar age at the tendency level. Conclusions: Indicators of individual relative biological and subjective aging affect the probability of getting COVID-19 and its severity. The combination of high indicators of biological aging and underestimated indicators of subjective aging is associated with increased chances of developing severe forms of the disease.

Use of Personal Resources May Influence the Rate of Biological Aging Depending on Individual Typology

“…The most important individual typological features was found to be gender. This is consistent with data previously obtained by us [ 54 , 58 ] and by other researchers [ 59 ]. The present study shows that, both in men and women, different resources are associated with the relative biological aging index.…”

Could Lower Testosterone in Older Men Explain Higher COVID-19 Morbidity and Mortalities?

“…In this sense, a recent article reported that men have accelerated biological aging during quarantine. Interestingly, this study found that biopsychological age might determine the risk to develop severe COVID-19 [194].…”

Individualized Biological Age as a Predictor of Disease: Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) Cohort

“…These were useful to understand the biological mechanism of aging, however, were inflexible to control the aging process. Moreover, limited studies were conducted to assess the BA as an index for predicting the risk of disease [ 26 , 27 ]. In this study, BA, which is calculated based on self-assessed risk factors, can be a useful indicator of health status.…”