2004 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37535)
DOI: 10.1109/mwsym.2004.1339160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceleration of finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) using graphics processor units (GPU)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, given the wide integration in commercial off the shelf computers, they represent a powerful and cheap solution to computational science. GPU computing is being exploited in many scientific applications [6][7][8] with interesting results in the EM field and nanotechnology [9,10]. Much published work on EM computational simulations using the GPUs confirms the growing interest in this powerful technology of the computational EM community [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, given the wide integration in commercial off the shelf computers, they represent a powerful and cheap solution to computational science. GPU computing is being exploited in many scientific applications [6][7][8] with interesting results in the EM field and nanotechnology [9,10]. Much published work on EM computational simulations using the GPUs confirms the growing interest in this powerful technology of the computational EM community [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although finiteelement and other matrix-formulated methods are very popular for irregular mesh problems [2], finite-difference methods continue to find use in computational simulations and generally are straightforward to parallelise using geometric stencil methods of decomposition which attain good computational speedup [3]- [5]. Although finite-difference methods are quite feasible to hand-parallelise for low-order stencils when a small number of neighbouring cells is required for each calculation, in cases when higher-order calculus operations are employed [6] the codes become: very complex; hard to implement manually; and very difficult to verify since a small programming error concerning a data index may still lead to a numerically plausible solution that is hard to spot as being wrong.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrete method of the core-shooting numerical simulation program is finite difference. Krakiwsky et al studied the finite difference time domain method with a GPU parallelization method, and good performance of GPU parallelization method has been proved in the improvement of computing efficiency and reliable simulation results [14,15] . In the casting field, simulation studies based on GPU have achieved some breakthroughs in the solidification process [16,17] , but the core shooting process is close to an isothermal process while the studies about the core shooting process are relatively limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parallel program was developed to simulate a relatively simple test-piece, and the algorithm was improved in the process. In the GPU parallelization method, data delay and model capability of parallelization have a great influence on the improvement of computing efficiency [10][11][12][13][14][15] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%