2016
DOI: 10.3354/esr00746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accelerometers and simple algorithms identify activity budgets and body orientation in African elephants Loxodonta africana

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches may increase the relative proportion of variation in elephant movement behavior explained by fruit availability. Additionally, coupling GPS collars with accelerometers would help deduce specific behaviors, such as foraging on fruit on the ground or leaves and branches at shoulder height, through movement and body posture (Brown et al, 2013;Soltis et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approaches may increase the relative proportion of variation in elephant movement behavior explained by fruit availability. Additionally, coupling GPS collars with accelerometers would help deduce specific behaviors, such as foraging on fruit on the ground or leaves and branches at shoulder height, through movement and body posture (Brown et al, 2013;Soltis et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular note is that the inactive behaviours (within the category 'resting') were rapidly discriminated using two or three decision rules based on static acceleration variables or posture-related parameters (see Fehlmann et al, 2017). This contrasts with other studies that have noted the value of dynamic acceleration (in some ways the polar opposite of static acceleration) in differentiating inactive from active behaviours (Shamoun-Baranes et al, 2012;Soltis et al, 2016). With specific regard to active locomotion behaviours, the direction (or sign) of the 'Diff_Deep' value was used by both algorithms, indicating the direction of movement and demonstrating the value of nonaccelerometer sensors in helping differentiate behaviours, while negative or positive values of StX gave information about the inclination of the body (upward-facing or downward-facing).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…We reserved the remainder of the identified behaviors for validation. Static acceleration (i.e., acceleration resulting from the position of the device in relation to the gravitational field) was extracted from the raw data using a 2-second moving window [4951]. Results were then subtracted from the raw values to determine dynamic acceleration - the acceleration resulting from movement [49, 51].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Static acceleration (i.e., acceleration resulting from the position of the device in relation to the gravitational field) was extracted from the raw data using a 2-second moving window [4951]. Results were then subtracted from the raw values to determine dynamic acceleration - the acceleration resulting from movement [49, 51]. In addition to static and dynamic acceleration, we calculated the running minimum and maximum of each axis and the vectorial sum of overall body acceleration (VeDBA; [52]), to include as predictor variables in the random forests model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%