1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70033-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability and impact of zidovudine for prevention of mother-to-child human immunodeficiency virus–1 transmission in France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…31 To determine the range of acceptance rates for the sensitivity analysis, we used acceptance rates from women who came for services to the Chicago Department of Public Health Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics and were offered HIV testing 32 and acceptance rates from other published reports in the medical literature. [33][34][35][36][37] The acceptance of AZT by pregnant women after they are told their HIV status is based on estimates from published studies and results obtained from the University of Illinois Women's Health Clinic 14,38,39 (M. Vajaranant, personal communication, August 1998).…”
Section: Probability Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 To determine the range of acceptance rates for the sensitivity analysis, we used acceptance rates from women who came for services to the Chicago Department of Public Health Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics and were offered HIV testing 32 and acceptance rates from other published reports in the medical literature. [33][34][35][36][37] The acceptance of AZT by pregnant women after they are told their HIV status is based on estimates from published studies and results obtained from the University of Illinois Women's Health Clinic 14,38,39 (M. Vajaranant, personal communication, August 1998).…”
Section: Probability Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, with the low baseline transmission risks suggested by these studies, it is difficult to determine whether prophylactic cesarean delivery would be a protective adjunct to combination drug therapy. French investigators in the European trial 30 decided to withdraw from the study after calculating that, given the current low rate of perinatal transmission observed in their patients receiving zidovudine monotherapy, 11 demonstration of the postulated 50% reduction in HIV transmission attributed to cesarean delivery would require a prohibitively large enrollment. Indeed, if the rate of transmission among patients receiving combination therapy were as low as 2% and could be reduced to 1% with prophylactic cesarean delivery, a clinical trial with 80% power to demonstrate this difference would require randomization of nearly 5000 patients.…”
Section: Evidence On Use Of Prophylactic Cesarean Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would counsel most HIV-infected pregnant women in the United States and other developed nations that if their HIV disease is well controlled and the viral load is suppressed with combination therapy, there is no evidence that prophylactic cesarean delivery would reduce the risk of vertical transmission beyond the already low rates associated with combination agents. For those receiving zidovudine monotherapy, we would counsel that the risk of transmission is moderate (approximately 5%) 11,12 and that the data are only suggestive that prophylactic cesarean delivery would be of protective benefit. Particularly relevant for women not receiving any antiretroviral therapy would be a discussion of the randomized trial evidence for a substantial reduction in transmission risk associated with prophylactic cesarean delivery.…”
Section: Counseling Pregnant Women With Hiv Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El esquema más utilizado en nuestro estudio fue de 2 INTR + 1 IP (70%), dando prioridad a zidovudine, pues fue la primera droga que demostró utilidad en la reducción de la transmisión perinatal, y con la que existe mayor experiencia (6,11,12).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified