2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of an inactivated influenza vaccine delivered by microneedle patch: Results from a phase I clinical trial of safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Four clinical trials of influenza vaccination have used dissolving patches. 5,[8][9][10] The TIVMNP2015 study showed that a microneedle patch containing an influenza vaccine is equivalent in safety and efficacy to intramuscular injection. 5 This effective immunological response can lead to a dosesparing effect, wherein the same immunological response can be triggered by a reduced antigen dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Four clinical trials of influenza vaccination have used dissolving patches. 5,[8][9][10] The TIVMNP2015 study showed that a microneedle patch containing an influenza vaccine is equivalent in safety and efficacy to intramuscular injection. 5 This effective immunological response can lead to a dosesparing effect, wherein the same immunological response can be triggered by a reduced antigen dose.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have shown that adults, children, parents, and clinicians prefer MN patch delivery over hypodermic injection. 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 When human subjects experienced both MN patch application to the skin and iontophoretic sweat testing in a prior study, there was no significant difference in reported pain between the two procedures. 27 Placebo MN patches, as well as MN patches administering various drugs and vaccines, have been shown to be well tolerated, with only transient, mild erythema reported as the most common side effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The fact that MN patches are generally perceived as painless 20,34,35 may also make this method of pilocarpine delivery more attractive to healthcare providers, patients, and their caregivers. Numerous studies have shown that adults, children, parents, and clinicians prefer MN patch delivery over hypodermic injection 35‐38 . When human subjects experienced both MN patch application to the skin and iontophoretic sweat testing in a prior study, there was no significant difference in reported pain between the two procedures 27 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 34 ] Ever since, the field of microneedle‐based transdermal drug delivery has experienced a rapid expansion for administering a wide variety of drugs, vaccines, or even genes. [ 35–43 ] Several of these microneedle delivery devices have been FDA‐approved or are currently in the clinical evaluation stage.…”
Section: Historical Evolution Of Microneedle‐based Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%