1998
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.317.7173.1652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of early discharge, hospital at home schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients in our study were recruited as outpatients and the management programme was directed by primary care, whereas in previous studies, 8,9 patients were randomized directly from a hospital emergency department and were, therefore, ‘considered inpatients in every sense other than that their care was provided at home’ 22 . Patients were also less severe than those in some other studies and this might have increased the chance of a positive result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients in our study were recruited as outpatients and the management programme was directed by primary care, whereas in previous studies, 8,9 patients were randomized directly from a hospital emergency department and were, therefore, ‘considered inpatients in every sense other than that their care was provided at home’ 22 . Patients were also less severe than those in some other studies and this might have increased the chance of a positive result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comments and findings which point out discrepancies in the findings from RCTs (Illife, 1998;Richards et al, 1998;Shepperd et al, 1998;Padigilone, 2002) have been criticized by proponents of HITH in Australia. As an example, Montalto & Grayson (1998) charge those, cautious of the benefits attributed to HITH, of misunderstanding the specifics of the definition of home care and not considering Antipodean successes.…”
Section: The Structure Of Expert Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The service was subsequently widened to include other patient groups and was found to be particularly valuable to elderly users. As in France, hospital-at-home schemes are well established in Australia (Montalto andGrayson 1998, Farnworth et al 1994), the United States (Weingarten et al 1994, cited in Wang et al 1998 and Sweden (Cedar and Thorngren 1982). In the United Kingdom, the majority of hospital-at-home schemes are set up to provide personal nursing and rehabilitation rather than technical services (Shepperd and Iliffe 1998).…”
Section: Origins Of Hospital At Homementioning
confidence: 99%