2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of the 6-PACK falls prevention program: A pre-implementation study in hospitals participating in a cluster randomized controlled trial

Abstract: There is limited evidence to support the effectiveness of falls prevention interventions in the acute hospital setting. The 6-PACK falls prevention program includes a fall-risk tool; ‘falls alert’ signs; supervision of patients in the bathroom; ensuring patients’ walking aids are within reach; toileting regimes; low-low beds; and bed/chair alarms. This study explored the acceptability of the 6-PACK program from the perspective of nurses and senior staff prior to its implementation in a randomised controlled tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
27
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were women in seven trials (Bischoff 2003; Chapuy 2002; Faber 2006; Irez 2011; Jarvis 2007; Kovacs 2012; Sihvonen 2004). Ten studies specifically recruited participants with cognitive impairment (Buettner 2002; Chenoweth 2009; Klages 2011; Kovacs 2013; Mador 2004; Neyens 2009; Shaw 2003; Toulotte 2003; Van de Ven 2014; Whitney 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All participants were women in seven trials (Bischoff 2003; Chapuy 2002; Faber 2006; Irez 2011; Jarvis 2007; Kovacs 2012; Sihvonen 2004). Ten studies specifically recruited participants with cognitive impairment (Buettner 2002; Chenoweth 2009; Klages 2011; Kovacs 2013; Mador 2004; Neyens 2009; Shaw 2003; Toulotte 2003; Van de Ven 2014; Whitney 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, there was a high risk of performance bias for the majority of studies due to lack of blinding. Only three trials were considered at low risk of bias for all or the majority of domains (Bischoff 2003; Broe 2007; Flicker 2005), these all examined vitamin D supplementation in comparison with placebo. However, for many other types of interventions, blinding was generally not feasible (e.g.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations