Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies 2003
DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044199-3/50001-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptability of Transport Pricing Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If a congestion charge scheme is perceived to be able to bring benefits to the majority, it is generally regarded as fair and consequently receives higher public support (Ittner et al, 2003;Fujii et al, 2004;Schade and Schlag, 2003;Jakobsson et al, 2000), two important factors on equity impact of congestion charge are initial travel patterns and revenue redistribution (Eliasson and Mattsson, 2006) Trust in government Trust in government can be related to fairness. Fujii (2005) reported that people's trust in government influences acceptability of congestion charge.…”
Section: Fairness (Equity)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…If a congestion charge scheme is perceived to be able to bring benefits to the majority, it is generally regarded as fair and consequently receives higher public support (Ittner et al, 2003;Fujii et al, 2004;Schade and Schlag, 2003;Jakobsson et al, 2000), two important factors on equity impact of congestion charge are initial travel patterns and revenue redistribution (Eliasson and Mattsson, 2006) Trust in government Trust in government can be related to fairness. Fujii (2005) reported that people's trust in government influences acceptability of congestion charge.…”
Section: Fairness (Equity)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…On the other hand, TDM measures are opposed by the public if they are perceived to be ineffective in solving the most important problems resulting from car use (e.g., congestion and environmental problems, see Rienstra, Rietveld, & Verhoef, 1999; Schade & Schlag, 2003). For example, public acceptability of a toll ring in Oslo increased after its introduction when traffic congestion decreased (Odeck & Bråthen, 2002).…”
Section: Public Acceptabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an elaborate review on various TC proposals in the transport domain, we refer to GrantMuller and Xu (2014) and Fan and Jiang (2013). At the same time, a parallel series of studies on the potential of so-called personal carbon trading schemes, targeting not only personal transport but all carbon emitting sources used by households, has emerged in the environmental literature (e.g., Starkey, 2012;Fawcett, 2010;Capstick and Lewis, 2010). The overall conclusions of these proposals are that TC schemes are theoretically efficient and could feasibly replace current road pricing and rationing initiatives, that widely encounter low acceptability rates (Jaensirisak et al, 2005;Schade and Schlag, 2003) and often lead to substantial undesirable side effects (Hao et al, 2011;Davis, 2008).…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%