2015
DOI: 10.1111/eip.12262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Acceptance rate of long‐acting injection after short information: a survey in patients with first‐ and multiple‐episode psychoses and their caregivers

Abstract: The present study demonstrated that a substantial portion of patients with first- and multiple-episode psychoses and their caregivers prefer LAI over their current oral medication. The acceptance of LAI was not increased by providing succinct information concerning this method of treatment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prescription rate of LAIA was roughly 18-26% in the present study, which is considerably higher than the 15.3% reported for East Asian countries 73 and even the 3.3% rate reported for Korea 74 . Considering that LAIA acceptance rates have been reported at 32.7% for patients with FEP 75 and that psychiatrists offered antipsychotic depot treatment to only 35% of their patients suffering from SZ or schizoaffective disorder 76 , there seems to be more room for LAIA. It is of interest that relapse rates in PNOS were relatively higher compared to SZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prescription rate of LAIA was roughly 18-26% in the present study, which is considerably higher than the 15.3% reported for East Asian countries 73 and even the 3.3% rate reported for Korea 74 . Considering that LAIA acceptance rates have been reported at 32.7% for patients with FEP 75 and that psychiatrists offered antipsychotic depot treatment to only 35% of their patients suffering from SZ or schizoaffective disorder 76 , there seems to be more room for LAIA. It is of interest that relapse rates in PNOS were relatively higher compared to SZ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, the panel of experts agreed that LAI formulations should be preferred in non-adherent patients, especially considering the significant delay in the time to relapse when this treatment formulation is discontinued or withdrawn. Such a delay is likely to be appreciated by family members/caregivers of non-adherent patients, as it gives more time to persuade the patient to resume antipsychotic treatment 88. The reduced need of monitoring treatment adherence provides the following advantages: on one hand, the treatment team can focus on the patient’s personal goals with a consequent improvement of therapeutic alliance;49 on the other hand, patients and caregivers can reduce disputes about medication adherence, which may lead them to feel a sense of greater stability that can consequently restore a family climate of “normality” 37…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a delay is likely to be appreciated by a non-adherent patient’s family members/caregivers, as it gives more time to persuade the patient to resume antipsychotic treatment. In fact, when asked whether they would have preferred the patient to be switched from the current oral antipsychotic formulation to a once-every-3-months LAI formulation, 67.5% of caregivers of first-episode patients and 77.8% of multiple-episode patients preferred the once-every-3-months formulation 88…”
Section: Adherence To Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the part of the patients, the refusal is related in particular to the mode of administration (injection), the control of the treatment (the feeling that they no longer decide), the administration protocols (in specialized centers, post injection monitoring in the case of olanzapine pamoate, etc.) (Yeo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Letter To the Editormentioning
confidence: 99%