2017
DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2017.1319760
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access and retention in French higher education: student drop-out as a form of regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Bodin and Orange ( 2018 :134), French universities “differ from their selective counterparts [in] that they offer relatively little supervision of students, whereas selective programmes tend to have smaller class sizes and closer supervision”. Universities can therefore be intimidating for students due to, among other things: limited contact hours, no monitoring of participation, and assessment period only twice a year.…”
Section: The French Context: Universities As “Weak Institutions”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Bodin and Orange ( 2018 :134), French universities “differ from their selective counterparts [in] that they offer relatively little supervision of students, whereas selective programmes tend to have smaller class sizes and closer supervision”. Universities can therefore be intimidating for students due to, among other things: limited contact hours, no monitoring of participation, and assessment period only twice a year.…”
Section: The French Context: Universities As “Weak Institutions”mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, they argued that prerequisites would lead to a selection based on social class differentiation. Moreover, many considered student drop-out to be a direct consequence of insufficient funding rather than inadequate selection (Bodin and Orange 2018).…”
Section: Recent Reforms and New Challenges To The Public Good In Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lemorzsolódást integrációs deficitként kezelő felfogás szerint az egyetem betölti a reá ruházott társadalmi funkciót, a lemorzsolódó hallgató viszont nem illeszkedik be az egyetem rendszerébe, ezért diszfunkcionális módon hagyja el a felsőoktatást. A felsőoktatás társadalmi szerepével kapcsolatban különféle jelentéstulajdonítások léteznek, melyek a felsőoktatást társadalmilag semlegesnek mutatják, és elfedik az integráció, illetve a szelekciós mechanizmusok funkcióit (Bodin & Orange, 2018;McDonough, 1994;Sommet és mtsai., 2015;O'Shea, 2016). Ugyanakkor az "illeszkedés" önmagában is olyan jelenség, melyről a hallgatónak saját interpretációja van (Knapp, Masterson & Kedharnath, 2017).…”
Section: A Hallgató éS Az Egyetem Közötti Illeszkedés éRtelmezéseunclassified