2016 International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icl-gnss.2016.7533850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access Point topology evaluation and optimization based on Cramér-Rao Lower Bound for WLAN indoor positioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the deviations from the ground truth in more depth the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) was calculated. The CRLB is defined as the inverse of the Fisher information matrix (FIM) [ 60 , 61 , 62 ]: …”
Section: Localization In the On-line Positioning Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate the deviations from the ground truth in more depth the Cramér-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) was calculated. The CRLB is defined as the inverse of the Fisher information matrix (FIM) [ 60 , 61 , 62 ]: …”
Section: Localization In the On-line Positioning Phasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in each case, the optimization objective varies, two general approaches can be distinguished. In the first one, the goal is to minimize the expected error of the positioning estimation (Baala et al, 2009, Sharma et al, 2010, He et al, 2011, Ficco et al, 2013, Li et al, 2015, Laitinen , Lohan, 2016, Voronov, 2017. However, it can be argued that making an accurate prediction of the error of a positioning estimation is quite challenging due to the complexity of properly modelling the error's sources themselves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this idea has been favoured by the latest papers on this field (Meng et al, 2012, Chen et al, 2014, Du , Yang, 2017, Alsmady , Awad, 2017, Eldeeb et al, 2018, it may still have some points of criticism, mainly related to the way this distance is measured. It is worth mentioning that in many cases, the objective of the studies was to also optimize the number of nodes needed to be deployed (and thus the installation cost) (He et al, 2011, Ficco et al, 2013, Chen et al, 2014, Li et al, 2015, Laitinen , Lohan, 2016.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [21], a map-assisted AP placement algorithm has been proposed, and an accuracy within 3 m of 71% has been achieved. In [22], AP topology has been evaluated and optimized utilizing Cramér-Rao Lower Bound calculation method. The deploying schemes in [20,21,22] have an instructional significance to the implementation of APs when a new indoor WLAN based positioning system is set up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22], AP topology has been evaluated and optimized utilizing Cramér-Rao Lower Bound calculation method. The deploying schemes in [20,21,22] have an instructional significance to the implementation of APs when a new indoor WLAN based positioning system is set up. However, the APs’ deployments in most positioning conditions are generally fixed together with the construction of these infrastructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%