2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2009.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Access regulation on NGA–A financial, market-led solution to bridge the gap between US and European diverging regulatory approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the initial proposition by Williamson (2007) and adoption by Ofcom and the European Commission there has been little discussion of the concept of anchor product regulation in the literature. The concept is mentioned by Lewin (2008), Williamson (2009), Lewin et al (2009) and Siciliani (2010).…”
Section: Literature On Anchor Product Pricing and Possible Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the initial proposition by Williamson (2007) and adoption by Ofcom and the European Commission there has been little discussion of the concept of anchor product regulation in the literature. The concept is mentioned by Lewin (2008), Williamson (2009), Lewin et al (2009) and Siciliani (2010).…”
Section: Literature On Anchor Product Pricing and Possible Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, estos planteamientos no encajan con la Recomendación de la CE ya que plantea la orientación a costes de todos los productos mayoristas (con prima de riesgo en algunos casos), si bien incluye mecanismos de flexibilización de los precios en forma de descuentos por duración y volumen de los contratos. Hasta el momento no es posible encontrar muchos ejemplos de este tipo de acuerdos, si bien en la literatura se recogen distintas aproximaciones a estos modelos planteando su capacidad para incentivar el despliegue de redes NGA en contraposición al modelo regulatorio clásico (Fredebeul-Krein & Knoben, 2010;Never, 2008;Siciliani, 2010).…”
Section: Compartición De Riesgo: Diferenciación De Tarifas E Inversió...unclassified
“…They conclude that although cost-based access prices lead to the aforementioned regulatory trade-off, there is still an ambiguity about access regulation and its linkage with overall investment incentives that should be further investigated. In this direction, Siciliani (2010) proposes a mechanism for preventing regulatory failures stemming from the demand-side uncertainty. However, according to OPTA (2008), not only the uncertainty about future demand for new fibre-based services deters the incumbent from investing in NGA networks, but also the regulatory uncertainty related to the regulator's limited ability to make ex ante credible commitments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, according to OPTA (2008), not only the uncertainty about future demand for new fibre-based services deters the incumbent from investing in NGA networks, but also the regulatory uncertainty related to the regulator's limited ability to make ex ante credible commitments. 2 Contrary to Siciliani (2010), we focus on the impact of regulatory uncertainty on the NGA investment level, which is one of the main open telecommunications policy issues worldwide. Since the regulators' goal is not only to encourage investments in NGA networks, but also to promote effective competition, the impact of regulatory uncertainty on the subsequent level of consumer surplus, which is used as a measure of the intensity of the competition in the retail market, will also be discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%