2012
DOI: 10.1108/10662241211214584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility and decay of web citations in five open access ISI journals

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this paper is to scrutinize the accessibility and decay of web references (URLs) cited in five open access social sciences journals indexed by ISI.Design/methodology/approachAfter acquiring all the papers published by these journals during 2002‐2007, their web citations were extracted and analyzed from an accessibility point of view. Moreover, for initially missed citations complementary pathways such as using Internet Explorer and the Google search engine were employed.FindingsThe study reve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
20
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The URLs which end with only the slash (/) and none of the file format was mentioned has been considered as HTML file. Some 741 out of 1094 URLs were HTM/HTML/SHTML files followed by PDF (241) and PHP (48).This finding matches with the previous findings of McCown et al (2005), Maharana, Nayak, and Sahu (2006), Moghaddam and Saberi (2010), Saberi and Abedi (2012), Sampath Kumar and Vinay Kumar (2013 Figure 2 indicates that the recovery of vanishing URLs via Internet Archive (IA) is highest for all years than Google search engine. An attempt has been made to recover vanishing URLs through Internet Archive and the Google which increased the rate of active URLs.…”
Section: Recovery Of Missing Urlssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The URLs which end with only the slash (/) and none of the file format was mentioned has been considered as HTML file. Some 741 out of 1094 URLs were HTM/HTML/SHTML files followed by PDF (241) and PHP (48).This finding matches with the previous findings of McCown et al (2005), Maharana, Nayak, and Sahu (2006), Moghaddam and Saberi (2010), Saberi and Abedi (2012), Sampath Kumar and Vinay Kumar (2013 Figure 2 indicates that the recovery of vanishing URLs via Internet Archive (IA) is highest for all years than Google search engine. An attempt has been made to recover vanishing URLs through Internet Archive and the Google which increased the rate of active URLs.…”
Section: Recovery Of Missing Urlssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Similar to previous studies by McCown, et al, (2005), Maharana, et al, (2006) and Saberi and Abedi (2012), the URLs in this study have been categorized into different file formats and presented in Table 8 for further analysis.…”
Section: File Formats Associated With Active and Missing Urlsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Videos can be added or removed at any time by their publishers (or by the host, for violations of copyright or community guidelines), and the order of material in search results may change from day to day. The phenomenon of web resources disappearing is known as “decay” or “modification” (Bar-Ilan & Peritz, 2008; Saberi & Abedi, 2012). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%