1968
DOI: 10.1177/004051756803800304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessibility and Reaction Sites in Cotton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later, Jeffries proposed a new formula to calculate the accessibility of a cellulose sample, assuming that the maximum moisture regain (MR) for completely accessible cellulose at 65% relative humidity was 17%, described by Eq. 1 (Jeffries et al 1968). …”
Section: Accessibility Of Cellulose Allomorphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Later, Jeffries proposed a new formula to calculate the accessibility of a cellulose sample, assuming that the maximum moisture regain (MR) for completely accessible cellulose at 65% relative humidity was 17%, described by Eq. 1 (Jeffries et al 1968). …”
Section: Accessibility Of Cellulose Allomorphsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accessibility of cellulose samples can be calculated according to equation (Jeffries et al 1968):…”
Section: Accessibility Of Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the following formula for calculating the accessibility of a cellulose sample was derived, assuming the maximum moisture regain for completely-accessible, < cellulose at 65% RH to be 17. (~Q [7]: ' All of the pretreated pulps had suf)stantialIN-higher moisture regains than did the unmercerized wood pulp. Liquid ammonia mercerization followed by evaporative removal of the ammonia resulted in a moisture regain of 12.2%, as compared to 12.6% with sodium hydroxide mercerization of Ravselect-J pulp, which is highly significant considering the much greater ease of the liquid ammonia treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…&dquo; Each value shcuvn represents the average of two specimens. Accessibility values were calculated from moisture-regain data assuming 17~ regain for completely accessible cellulose [7]. ~ ''Two similar batches were prepared from dry sheets by shredding in a blender, soaking in water at 5.5°C for several hours, and drying from acetone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeffries and others [4,5] reported that the absorption of IR by OD near 2530 cm-' was due to &dquo;disordered&dquo; OH (OD), and the CH band near 2900 cm -' was independent of the deuteration. The ratio of intensity thus determined with the baseline technique from these bands (12530 em -1/12900 cm ' ) represents the accessibility of the sample fiber to water vapor ( Table V).…”
Section: Infrared Deuterationmentioning
confidence: 99%