1985
DOI: 10.2307/3801690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accessing Accuracy of a Radiotelemetry System for Estimating Animal Locations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, radio signals are affected by a variety of environmental factors such as vegetation, rocks and water bodies which absorb, refract or reflect a signal (Lee et al 1985, Swain & Bishop-Hurley 2007. To test whether the mean RSSI can be used to differentiate between close-range and long-range encounters, we compared logged RSSI values with estimated distances of simultaneously visually-observed encounters.…”
Section: Validation Of Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, radio signals are affected by a variety of environmental factors such as vegetation, rocks and water bodies which absorb, refract or reflect a signal (Lee et al 1985, Swain & Bishop-Hurley 2007. To test whether the mean RSSI can be used to differentiate between close-range and long-range encounters, we compared logged RSSI values with estimated distances of simultaneously visually-observed encounters.…”
Section: Validation Of Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bearings and locations collected using radio telemetry are subject to error (White and Garrott, 1990;Lee et a/., 1985). Sources of variation and bias are numerous and include equipment imprecision, compass inaccuracy, observer variability, meteorological disturbances (Saltz and Alkon, 1985;Springer, 1979), and signal bounce from geographic features (Golightly, pers.…”
Section: Error Accuracy and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bearing estimated by an observer (0') will be the sum of error (e) and the true bearing (0) (Lee, et al, 1985).…”
Section: Error Accuracy and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source of most errors is the location of the transmitter relative to the receiving system (Chu and others 1989, Lee andothers 1985, Springer 1979). Storm (1965) found that locations on flat ground up to 400 meters away are accurate to within 16 meters, but when the receiver and the transmitter are separated by ridges, the error increases to 96 meters.…”
Section: Quality Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two factors affecting the size and shape of the error polygon and the accuracy of the location are the system precision and the location of the transmitter relative to the receiving system (Lee and others 1985, Springer 1979). The system precision is affected by the equipment, observers, and telemetry techniques.…”
Section: Sources Of Errormentioning
confidence: 99%