1992
DOI: 10.1177/0148558x9200700205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accommodating Outliers and Nonlinearity in Decision Models

Abstract: This paper describes and compares six procedures that can be used in a regression model to adjust for outliers in the data and nonlinearities in the relationship between the dependent and independent variables. The data accommodation procedures are: (1) noadjustment; (2) winsorizing ; (3) trimming; (4) regression on ranks; (5) nonlinear regression; and (6) piecewise linear regression. The results show that the choice of data accommodation procedure has a major impact on the predictive ability and coeficient es… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
44
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of different tests ensures that the relationships identified are not influenced by the statistical procedure employed and helps control for the effects of the distributions of the data (Kennedy, Lakonishok and Shaw, 1992;Camp, Nenide, Pricer and Sexton, 1999). Each of the tests applied for both employment and sales measures of performance are described below:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of different tests ensures that the relationships identified are not influenced by the statistical procedure employed and helps control for the effects of the distributions of the data (Kennedy, Lakonishok and Shaw, 1992;Camp, Nenide, Pricer and Sexton, 1999). Each of the tests applied for both employment and sales measures of performance are described below:…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques exist to normalize data (e.g., logarithmic transformation). We relied on the Winsor technique (e.g., Kennedy, Lakonishok, & Shaw, 1992), where a fixed percentage (in our case 5%) of the outlier cases at the tale of the distribution receive the same values as the observations at the truncation point (i.e., the 95 percentile). This transformation led to a distribution that was acceptable, with a minimum change in the data.…”
Section: Employment and Sales Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been recommended as an effective method for addressing outliers and obtaining normal distributions without the loss of data (Kennedy, Lakonishok, and Shaw, 1992). Firms with negative equity were excluded from analyses that included return on invested capital, as negative equity could provide mis- …”
Section: Data Adjustmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%