“…Such diversity arises from differences in preferences and access to services with regards to differences in rural versus urban settings [ 16 , 17 ], income [ 18 ], orientation (e.g., lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender sensitivities [ 19 ]), older adults with special needs (e.g., intellectual disabilities [ 20 ] and prisoners [ 21 ]), older adults with special circumstances (e.g., adults who are caring for children with developmental disorders [ 22 ]), more general differences in eastern versus western views on aging in place [ 23 ], and broad international differences in services that individuals require, want, and need [ 24 ]. Regardless of these differences, the concept of aging in place has established itself internationally, with studies documented in Sweden [ 25 ], China [ 26 ], the United Kingdom [ 27 ], Japan [ 28 ], New Zealand [ 29 ], Australia [ 30 ], Malaysia [ 31 ], and Taiwan [ 32 ].…”