1961
DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.11.443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accommodation in Spinal Motoneurons of the Cat

Abstract: Recently several papers appeared in succession concerning accommodation of the spinal motoneurons. Working with exponentially increasing currents applied to the toad's spinal motoneurons, ARAKI and OTANI (1959) found that the motoneuron fired from higher depolarization levels when the rate of rise of the stimulating current was reduced. Besides, they found that accommodation was considerably slower in soma-dendritic membrane than in the initial segment of axon. ARAKI (1960) studied further the effect of electr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
15
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would include the notion of motoneurone accommodation to sustained input, which in a number of studies has been linked to the duration of the post-spike hyperpolarization of the cells (see Sasaki & Otani, 1961;Ushiyama, Koizumi & Brooks, 1966). However, the variability in results dependent on experimental conditions (see Yamashita, 1966) and the demonstration that most a motoneurones can sustain repetitive firing given sufficient current input (Kernell, 1965(Kernell, , 1966a make it difficult to form any firm conclusion about the possible relevance of accommodative reactions to the present experimental results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This would include the notion of motoneurone accommodation to sustained input, which in a number of studies has been linked to the duration of the post-spike hyperpolarization of the cells (see Sasaki & Otani, 1961;Ushiyama, Koizumi & Brooks, 1966). However, the variability in results dependent on experimental conditions (see Yamashita, 1966) and the demonstration that most a motoneurones can sustain repetitive firing given sufficient current input (Kernell, 1965(Kernell, , 1966a make it difficult to form any firm conclusion about the possible relevance of accommodative reactions to the present experimental results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Such a qualitative distinction may be found in cell properties not studied here, such as in accommodative mechanisms (Sasaki & Otani, 1961;Ushiyama, Koizumi & Brooks, 1966) or in the organization patterns of synaptic input to different motoneurones (see Sasaki & Tanaka, 1964;Bosemark, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…post-synaptically. Such post-synaptic factors would include the relation between membrane potential and threshold for impulse initiation and differences in adaptation to membrane potential changes (Eccles, 1961;Sasaki & Otani, 1961). Systematic variation in the amount of depolarization necessary to reach threshold for a conducted action potential would be sufficient to explain differences in the responsiveness of elements of a motoneurone pool provided that reflex excitability was always parallel for the various tests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%