2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2008.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for control and trust building in interfirm transactional relationships

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
160
3
15

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(184 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
160
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…The insignificant relationships obtained for control and community dimensions seem to contradict the results of previous studies conducted by Vosselman and Van der Meer-Kooistra (2009). One might argue that the presence of multiple factors having significant correlations with trust and exhaustion could have attenuated the effects of community and control.…”
Section: Discussion For the Main Effects Of Areas Of Worklife And Orgcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The insignificant relationships obtained for control and community dimensions seem to contradict the results of previous studies conducted by Vosselman and Van der Meer-Kooistra (2009). One might argue that the presence of multiple factors having significant correlations with trust and exhaustion could have attenuated the effects of community and control.…”
Section: Discussion For the Main Effects Of Areas Of Worklife And Orgcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…the fear of opportunistic behavior). In this regard, control is considered to be an important element in building trust (Vosselman, & Van der Meer-Kooistra, 2009). Specifically, having a sense of control over work outcomes and relationships, reduces the need to control the organization's actions.…”
Section: Areas Of Work Life and Organizational Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding can be interpreted as when teachers' trust in students increase, their scores of rules and consequences discipline model decrease; and when teachers' trust in students decrease, their scores of rules and consequences discipline model increase. Individuals who trust people more control them less, and individuals who trust people less control them more (Vosselman & Meer-Kooistra, 2009). Also, when the trust level between educators and learners decrease, educators tend to use more power (Oosthuizen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, when teachers distrust their students, they control them more (Oosthuizen et al, 2003). However, individuals tend to use less power towards trusted people and tend to control them less (Das & Teng, 2001;Klein-Woolthuis, Hillebrand, & Nooteboom, 2005;Vosselman & Meer-Kooistra, 2009;Neveu, 2004). In other words, trustee's behaviors are not controlled or are controlled less by trustor (Das & Teng, 2001;Inkpen & Currall, 2004;Vlaar, Van den Bosch & Volberda, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst far from exhaustive, the frameworks selected here represent the development of management control theory addressing predefined criteria.  Management Control Archetypes -a multi-theory perspective focussed on emergence of control problems (Caglio & Ditillo 2008);  Management Control Packages -focussed on the practice of combining of controls into "packages" (Malmi & Brown, 2008);  Trust-Building Management Control-based on a synthesis of the extant trustbuilding literature (Vosselman & Meer-Kooistra, 2008).…”
Section: Management Control Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%