2010
DOI: 10.1002/kpm.355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for intellectual capital: On the elusive path from theory to practice

Abstract: Intellectual capital emerged approximately twenty years ago as an alternative paradigm with the ambition to identify, measure, report and manage knowledge assets. While the need for regulatory frameworks to account for knowledge assets and intangible drivers of value was pressing in the setting of the ''new economy'', intellectual capital has yet to establish itself as a dominant solution for accounting theorists, corporate professionals and regulators. This paper analyzes intellectual capital as a tool to mee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, there is evidence that terminology used by KM/IC researchers has little relevance to industry professionals (Eijkman, 2011). Despite theoretical advancements in the KM/IC field, IC reporting has not become the central system for the valuation, measurement, and reporting of intangible assets (Andrikopoulos, 2010). Initially, the scholarly side of the KM/IC discipline was represented by both academics and practitioners; gradually, however, industry professionals withdrew from academic research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, there is evidence that terminology used by KM/IC researchers has little relevance to industry professionals (Eijkman, 2011). Despite theoretical advancements in the KM/IC field, IC reporting has not become the central system for the valuation, measurement, and reporting of intangible assets (Andrikopoulos, 2010). Initially, the scholarly side of the KM/IC discipline was represented by both academics and practitioners; gradually, however, industry professionals withdrew from academic research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intellectual capital (IC), defined as the set of intangible assets from which ventures can derive their competitive advantage, enhance profit and create value, continues to attract widespread attention (Bontis 1996;Bontis 1998;Bontis 2001;Sveiby 1997;Petty and Guthrie 2000;Hormiga et al 2011). Many scholars have already shed light on the different dimensions of intellectual capital (Andrikopoulos 2010). One of the most widely accepted definition by Edvinsson and Sullivan 1996 considered IC as the knowledge that can be converted into value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing IC efficiently (that is, managing and transforming various intangible resources to create or maximize value) is considered the key to sustain competitive edge for each kind of organization (Kujansivu, 2009;Kweh et al, 2013;Veltri & Bronzetti, 2015). The measurement of intellectual capital (IC) and its contribution to the firm's value is one of the central theme of the IC literature, since from the pioneering article of Bontis (1998) (Andrikopoulos, 2010;Booker et al, 2008;Dumay, 2014;Serenko & Bontis, 2004;Veltri, 2012). Several are the measurement method proposed and used in literature, both quantitative and qualitative (Pulic, 2000;Veltri, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%