2011
DOI: 10.1117/12.879704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for mask topography effects in source-mask optimization for advanced nodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we compute the derivatives of the cost function in Eqs. (11) and (12). Due to the discrete nature of the source and mask, the differential operator∂ /∂ M and ∂ /∂ J are approximated by numerical differences.…”
Section: A Appendix: Gradients Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we compute the derivatives of the cost function in Eqs. (11) and (12). Due to the discrete nature of the source and mask, the differential operator∂ /∂ M and ∂ /∂ J are approximated by numerical differences.…”
Section: A Appendix: Gradients Derivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several well known numerical algorithms of solving Maxwell's equations, such as finite-difference time domain (FDTD) [8], rigorous coupled wave analysis (RCWA) [9] or the waveguide method [10] are used to model the light propagation through the mask in optical lithography. Unfortunately, the convergence of rigorous methods depends on mesh setting, accuracy requirements and boundary conditions [11]. As a consequence, high accuracy is achieved at a large computational cost, which limits the wide adoption of rigorous 3D mask modeling for practical large layout simulations in advanced resolution enhancement techniques (RETs) such as source and mask optimization (SMO) [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Rigorous 3D mask experiments have confirmed that mask topography is a leading cause due to the fact that the thickness of the mask absorber produces phase errors among different diffraction orders. 2,3 Unfortunately, the rigorous electromagnetic field (EMF) modeling used to describe light diffraction from the mask generally involves intensive computation, 4 which limits the wide adoption of rigorous 3D mask modeling for practical large layout simulations in advanced resolution enhancement techniques (RETs) such as source and mask optimization (SMO). 5,6 Additionally, although SMO is a powerful and effective technique which provides more flexibility regarding both the mask design and illumination configuration adjustment, [7][8][9][10] it is inadequate to control the phase in the lens pupil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%