2003
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2003.0094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting for sensor calibration, concentration heterogeneity, measurement and sampling uncertainties in monitoring urban drainage systems

Abstract: Assessing the functioning and the performance of urban drainage systems on both rainfall event and yearly time scales is usually based on online measurements of flow rates and on samples of influent effluent for some rainfall events per year. In order to draw pertinent scientific and operational conclusions from the measurement results, it is absolutely necessary to use appropriate methods and techniques in order to i) calibrate sensors and analytical methods, ii) validate raw data, iii) evaluate measurement u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To determine whether a sensor node is malfunctioning, validation methods are applied to sensor data, aiming to find devious sensor readings from normal ones. There is no such an ideal validation method, because they are very dependent on sensor measurement conditions and the overall environment context (Freitas et al, 2010), (Branisavljević et al, 2011), (Bertrand-Krajewski et al, 2003), (Vasconcelos et al, 2012), and (Liu et al, 2013). Usually, several methods are applied successively to the sensor data, because each method is suitable to detect particular types of faulty data.…”
Section: Sensor Data Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine whether a sensor node is malfunctioning, validation methods are applied to sensor data, aiming to find devious sensor readings from normal ones. There is no such an ideal validation method, because they are very dependent on sensor measurement conditions and the overall environment context (Freitas et al, 2010), (Branisavljević et al, 2011), (Bertrand-Krajewski et al, 2003), (Vasconcelos et al, 2012), and (Liu et al, 2013). Usually, several methods are applied successively to the sensor data, because each method is suitable to detect particular types of faulty data.…”
Section: Sensor Data Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, corresponding investment in sampling equipment are negligible by comparison. The importance of sampling in terms of errors has been demonstrated in numerous domains, and also in environmental areas (Christakos and Olea, 1992;Littlewood, 1995;Isidoro et al 2003;Bertrand-Krajewski et al 2003;Johnes, 2007;Ort and Gujer 2006). For example, large uncertainties (30%-100%) in stormwater data result from the different sampling and analytical steps (sampling of water, sample conservation, reconstitution of a flow-weighted composite sample and chemical laboratory analyses) (Rossi 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other well-known limitations to this approach are sampling errors and errors due to sample conservation, transport and preparation (see e.g. Bertrand- Krajewski et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%