2017
DOI: 10.1177/1032373217732349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting historians engaging with scholars inside and outside accounting: Issues, opportunities and obstacles

Abstract: Originating in a panel presentation at the eighth Accounting History International Conference, this study offers a reflection on the issues, opportunities and obstacles which may arise when accounting historians engage with other accounting scholars and scholars outside of accounting. Supporting the view that accounting scholars need and should make an effort to engage with other scholars inside and outside accounting, various aspects are considered as enhancing the interdisciplinarity of accounting history re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet the boundaries are often where accounting is at its most interesting (Miller, 1998). This is a stance readily supported by accounting historians who recognise the importance of pushing the boundaries of our discipline (Fowler and Keeper, 2016) and of furthering its interdisciplinary agenda (Baskerville et al, 2017). Indeed, accounting history is inherently interdisciplinary (Carnegie and Napier, 2012) and therefore easily operates across a broad domain of intellectual curiosity.…”
Section: Some Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet the boundaries are often where accounting is at its most interesting (Miller, 1998). This is a stance readily supported by accounting historians who recognise the importance of pushing the boundaries of our discipline (Fowler and Keeper, 2016) and of furthering its interdisciplinary agenda (Baskerville et al, 2017). Indeed, accounting history is inherently interdisciplinary (Carnegie and Napier, 2012) and therefore easily operates across a broad domain of intellectual curiosity.…”
Section: Some Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As widely known, interdisciplinarity has enhanced the growth of accounting history research; this is particularly accentuated by the growing call for studying accounting as a social practice. Within accounting history research, new research topics, research approaches, and the use of different theoretical perspectives and methodological approaches drawn from other disciplines, have increased the potentialities and dimensions of the investigations undertaken (Baskerville, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Review and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We do agree that this dimension provides research opportunities that are rarely covered by traditional accounting research, which is sometimes functionalist in nature (Lai and Samkin, 2017: 268). Instead, by drawing on theoretical underpinnings of other disciplines, accounting historians can contribute to offer new findings or new interpretations to modern phenomena grounded on experiences of the past (Baskerville et al, 2017). Research in accounting and governance in the past may enlarge the already prolific stream of studies informed on the ‘accounting and power’ framework (Foucault, 1991), but may expand further.…”
Section: Accounting and Governance In Historical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%