2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jengtecman.2006.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting, innovation, and incentives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Subramanian and Nilakanta (1996) classify organizational innovation into two categories: (1) technological innovation, including product, services and processes, as well as (2) administrative innovation, including organizational structure, administrative process and programs. Pacharn and Zhang (2006) propose two types of innovation, namely organizational innovation and technological innovation. In fact, researchers, such as Desouza et al (2007) suggest two forms of innovation exist in a corporate environment (i.e., user innovations and organizational innovations).…”
Section: Organizational Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Subramanian and Nilakanta (1996) classify organizational innovation into two categories: (1) technological innovation, including product, services and processes, as well as (2) administrative innovation, including organizational structure, administrative process and programs. Pacharn and Zhang (2006) propose two types of innovation, namely organizational innovation and technological innovation. In fact, researchers, such as Desouza et al (2007) suggest two forms of innovation exist in a corporate environment (i.e., user innovations and organizational innovations).…”
Section: Organizational Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) administrative innovation, including organizational structure, administrative process, and programs. Pacharn and Zhang (2006) propose two types of innovation, namely, OI and technological innovation. In fact, researchers, such as Desouza et al (2007) suggest that two forms of innovation exist in a corporate environment (i.e.…”
Section: Organizational Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite huge differences all structural units within research institutions can be compared with respect to the commercialization potential of their research results in total or per capita. This approach reduces searching costs (Pacharn and Zhang, 2006). Rewards on the basis of our proposed rankings as part of an incentive scheme might strengthen the perception of knowledge transfer within research institutions (Perkmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Contributionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to Cooper, this is a tool to acquire and gain access to valuable knowledge. The resulting transparency reduces the R&D costs of scientific institutions (Pacharn and Zhang, 2006).Such systems are fundamental preconditions for firms to optimally exploit R&D activities with the goal to secure competitive advantages and improve (their) market position. However, for research institutions an evaluation system has to consider differing output formats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sendo assim, deve-se registrar a perda quando o valor contábil do ativo for superior ao seu valor em uso indicado pelo valor presente de fluxos de caixa futuros estimados. O uso do impairment test para o goodwill no lugar de amortização, pode produzir efeito favorável no resultado financeiro de determinadas organizações (BAKER;WEARING, 2001;PACHARN;ZHANG, 2006).…”
Section: Teste De Recuperabilidade De Ativosunclassified