2020
DOI: 10.26675/jabe.v5i1.12569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accounting Students’ Academic Fraud: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia

Abstract: The high rates of academic fraud in many countries make this research important to be conducted. This research aimed at investigating the factors which influenced accounting students’ academic fraud as seen from fraud triangle theory and 220 accounting students were randomly sampled to be its samples. The data were collected using a questionnaire distributed either in person to the respondents or using a google form. The data were analyzed using multiple regression. The research results indicated that fraud tr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this test are consistent with the results of research by Savilia dan Laily (2020), Haziq et al (2021), andJereb et al (2018), which stated that pressure (both internal and external) affects a person's tendency to commit academic fraud. More pressure leads to a more significant tendency to commit academic fraud (Savilia & Laily, 2020). In addition, the results of this test are also in line with the FST (Fraud Scale Theory) developed by Albrecht et al (1984), which states that situational pressure is one of the elements that trigger fraud.…”
Section: Total Average Situational Pressuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The results of this test are consistent with the results of research by Savilia dan Laily (2020), Haziq et al (2021), andJereb et al (2018), which stated that pressure (both internal and external) affects a person's tendency to commit academic fraud. More pressure leads to a more significant tendency to commit academic fraud (Savilia & Laily, 2020). In addition, the results of this test are also in line with the FST (Fraud Scale Theory) developed by Albrecht et al (1984), which states that situational pressure is one of the elements that trigger fraud.…”
Section: Total Average Situational Pressuresupporting
confidence: 85%