2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.2815
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and Methodologic Challenges of Volatile Organic Compound–Based Exhaled Breath Tests for Cancer Diagnosis

Abstract: The findings of our review suggest that standardization of breath collection methods and masked validation of breath test accuracy for cancer diagnosis is needed among the intended population in multicenter clinical trials. We propose a framework to guide the conduct of future breath tests in cancer studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
171
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
3
171
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies were Phase I biomarker discovery studies. Of the 30 included studies, 18 were from Asia and the Far East [8,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], seven from Europe [27][28][29][30][31][32][33], three from North America [34][35][36], and two from the Middle East [37,38]. ASCC tumour sites identified were the head and neck (n = 17), oesophageal (n = 8), and lung (n = 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All studies were Phase I biomarker discovery studies. Of the 30 included studies, 18 were from Asia and the Far East [8,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26], seven from Europe [27][28][29][30][31][32][33], three from North America [34][35][36], and two from the Middle East [37,38]. ASCC tumour sites identified were the head and neck (n = 17), oesophageal (n = 8), and lung (n = 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in upper gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma (the other major ASCC subtype), exhaled metabolites have demonstrated promise for detecting treatable disease stages [8][9][10]. However, progress in this field has been hampered by inadequate standardisation, inconsistent quality assurance, and evolving analytical technology [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A meta‐analysis of 63 studies on 3554 patients with different cancer types (mostly lung, breast and gastro‐oesophageal) has shown a sensitivity of breath testing for cancer diagnosis ranging from 28% to 100%, and a specificity of 61–100%. The overall pooled analysis showed a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.9, and a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 79% (95% CI = 77–81%) and 89% (95% CI = 88–90%), respectively (Hanna et al ., ). The substantial heterogeneity between the studies, including different methods of sample collection and test environment, remains a limitation of this analysis.…”
Section: Technologies For Early Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sensor response to VOCs can be analysed by pattern recognition algorithms to classify different cases individually, in which the principal component reduction and subsequent pattern recognition by discriminant analysis are the most frequently used types of raw-data analysis for their responses [5]. Other techniques are also used for data analysis, such as machine-learning algorithms and neural networks [111]. These techniques mimic the cognitive process of the human brain, containing interconnected data processing algorithms that work in parallel [110].…”
Section: Future Perspectives and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%