2013
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12332
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and precision of photoacoustic spectroscopy not guaranteed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(29 reference statements)
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Between measurements the cuvette was lifted and ventilated for 2 min to reduce unwanted feedback on gas emissions due to high cuvette air moisture and temperature ( Predotova et al, 2009). Previous experiments showed that during such accumulation times non‐condensing moisture conditions prevailed and measurements were reliable for CO 2 and, as long as and the instrument was properly calibrated, also for NH 3 , and N 2 O, but inaccurate for CH 4 ( Predotova et al, 2011; Iqbal et al, 2012; Rosenstock et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between measurements the cuvette was lifted and ventilated for 2 min to reduce unwanted feedback on gas emissions due to high cuvette air moisture and temperature ( Predotova et al, 2009). Previous experiments showed that during such accumulation times non‐condensing moisture conditions prevailed and measurements were reliable for CO 2 and, as long as and the instrument was properly calibrated, also for NH 3 , and N 2 O, but inaccurate for CH 4 ( Predotova et al, 2011; Iqbal et al, 2012; Rosenstock et al, 2013).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…0.0–0.7 ppm), Rosenstock et al . () suggested that the results of Iqbal et al . () were limited to unique experimental conditions including relatively high N 2 O concentrations and fluxes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In response, Rosenstock et al . () initiated a valuable dialogue by reminding readers that analytical instrument accuracy and precision are not guaranteed. Although we agree with this primary assertion, several other assertions in the authors' letter are flawed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, because GHGs and water vapor have multiple absorption bands across the measuring spectra, such instruments are prone to interferences. Recently, Rosenstock et al ( 2013 ) showed that for INNOVA instruments N 2 O concentration measurements were non-linearly affected by water content and CO 2 . Comparable results were already reported by Flechard et al ( 2005 ), though only a few researchers have noted the problems that might be associated with the use of PAS.…”
Section: Spectroscopic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%