2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.71.125424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy and resolution limits of Kelvin probe force microscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

20
425
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 403 publications
(461 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
20
425
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, On the other hand, as the AFM tip is broader (25 nm) than the grain boundary itself, the surface potential measured for the grain boundary is not the pure potential of the grain boundary itself [33][34], but a mixed signal of the grain boundary and adjacent space charge layer (defined above as electrical grain boundary) [42]. Therefore, we assume that the actual surface potential difference between grain and of the grain boundary core should be even lower than our measured values.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Defect Formation By Kelvin Probe Force Micromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, On the other hand, as the AFM tip is broader (25 nm) than the grain boundary itself, the surface potential measured for the grain boundary is not the pure potential of the grain boundary itself [33][34], but a mixed signal of the grain boundary and adjacent space charge layer (defined above as electrical grain boundary) [42]. Therefore, we assume that the actual surface potential difference between grain and of the grain boundary core should be even lower than our measured values.…”
Section: Analysis Of the Defect Formation By Kelvin Probe Force Micromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) has undergone significant advances in both sensitivity [4][5][6][7] and resolution [8][9][10], with a broad spectrum of configurations now available. KPFM has been applied to study a variety of materials, including organic, biological, and energy conversion and storage-related materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For conducting surfaces it is well established, that KPFM reveals the so called local contact potential difference (LCPD) with a lateral resolution in the order of the tip front end [35][36][37][38][39][40] . For insulating surfaces and nanoscale contrast, the contrast mechanisms are much more complex since not only the exact geometry of the tip-sample system has to be considered, but also charges and (induced) dipoles within the system (polarization effects) [41][42][43] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%