2013
DOI: 10.1111/jce.12264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy Assessment of Catheter Guidance Technology in Electrophysiology Procedures

Abstract: Each of the evaluated EP guidance systems showed a high level of accuracy; the observed offsets between the virtual 3D visualization and the real phantom were below a clinically relevant threshold of 3 mm.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, white matter signals fluctuation on T2-weighted BOLD contrast images are associated with aging and cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) [ 308 ]. Therefore, for accuracy assessment of catheter guidance technology in electrophysiology procedures a new 3D-based fluoroscopy navigation system is developed for electroanatomic mapping [ 74 ]. NAWM (normal appearing white matter) was found to have graded increases in cardiac pulsations due to age and SVD, independently.…”
Section: Anatomical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, white matter signals fluctuation on T2-weighted BOLD contrast images are associated with aging and cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) [ 308 ]. Therefore, for accuracy assessment of catheter guidance technology in electrophysiology procedures a new 3D-based fluoroscopy navigation system is developed for electroanatomic mapping [ 74 ]. NAWM (normal appearing white matter) was found to have graded increases in cardiac pulsations due to age and SVD, independently.…”
Section: Anatomical Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, CARTO ® technology was impedance-based as well as electromagnetic-based. In a phantom experiment a significantly better point localization by CARTO3 ® in comparison to EnSite Velocity ® could be demonstrated [19]. A randomized comparison of CARTOmerge ® vs. EnSite NavX ® in RFA for AF could demonstrate a significantly higher accuracy in lesion distance to the shell: 2.0 mm vs. 3.4 mm [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It should be noted that a single incorrect registration point could produce a shifted map with unprecise localization of the PV ostia. There are data showing a higher precision of the surface-merge without a subsequent registration step for the CARTO ® system in comparison to the point-by-point technique of EnSite ® [19]. The values ranged from 0.73 mm for CARTO3 ® vs. 2.02 mm for EnSite Velocity ® .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the remaining 15% of the cases or if higher accuracy level, for example, 3 mm [ 29 ], is required, small manual adjustment may be necessary in these cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%