Accuracy Limits of Embedded Smart Device Accelerometer Sensors

Abstract

Smartphones are an indispensable tool in modern day-today life. Their widespread use has spawned numerous applications targeting diverse domains such as bio-medical, environment sensing and infrastructure monitoring. In such applications, the accuracy of the sensors at the core of the system is still questionable, since these devices are not originally designed for high accuracy sensing purposes. In this work, we investigate the accuracy limits of one of the commonly used sensors, namely, smartphone accelerometer. We focus on the efficacy of a smartphone as an acceleration measuring device, rather than focusing only on the accuracy of its internal accelerometer chip. This holistic approach includes additional errors that arise from the device operating system such as sampling time uncertainty. Hence, we propose a novel smart device accelerometer error model that includes the traditional additive noise as well as sampling time uncertainty errors represented by a white Gaussian process. The model is validated experimentally using shake table experiments, and maximum likelyhood estimation (MLE) is used to estimate the sampling time uncertainty standard deviation. Moreover, we derive the Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) of acceleration estimation based on the proposed model.

Design and Research of VR Basketball Teaching System Based on Embedded Intelligent Sensor

“…Ibrahim et al examined the limitations of commonly used sensor accuracy and proposed a new error model for the smart device accelerator, which also includes traditional noise as well as the sampling time uncertainty error represented by the Gaussian white process. The model was experimentally confirmed by earthquake experiments, and the estimate of the maximum variance was used to estimate the standard deviation of the uncertainty at the time of sampling [ 9 ]. Ray et al talked about the development, operation, and performance of intelligent flight sensors.…”

Seismocardiography with Smartphones: No Leap from Bench to Bedside (Yet)

“…But even with standardized API based access to the sensors, varying degrees of sensitivity of the sensors regarding the measurements (and potential interference) must be considered. Latencies introduced for technical reasons, as well as due to the operating system, can also influence the measurement [8].…”

Structural Health Monitoring in Composite Structures: A Comprehensive Review

“…Any SHM system requires a data-collection mechanism, for which different types of sensors can be selected depending on the type of data required for damage detection. Some commonly used sensors include strain gauges [ 98 ], accelerometers [ 99 ], temperature gauges [ 100 ], acoustic emission sensors [ 101 ], and fiber optic-based sensor systems [ 102 ]. Several factors to be considered prior to select sensors for an SHM system are described as follows: Type of sensors; Sensor cost(s); Number of sensors and their installation procedure; Damage protection against mechanical and chemical factors; Reduction in the effect of noise; Data-collection procedure; and Sensitivity of sensors to long-term environmental effects, such as moisture and humidity.…”