“…After the inclusion criteria were applied, 21 articles were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies were removed due to the exclusion criteria (no full text or translation in the English language, n = 3 articles; use of non-3-T MRI, n = 3; inability to use results because of inappropriate methods, n = 1; and review article of different 3-T MRI protocols, n = 1), resulting in 13 studies included for the final review [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. Table 1 shows the results of the QUADAS-2 tool for the 13 studies: Seven studies scored 11 points or 100% [33,[36][37][38][39][40]42], four studies scored 10 points or 91% [32,35,43,44], and two studies scored 9 points or 82% [34,41].…”