2022
DOI: 10.3390/ejihpe12010004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of Body Mass Index and Obesity Status in Police Trainees

Abstract: The first aim of this study was to compare body mass index (BMI) (indirect method) classification with the body fat percent (PBF) (direct method) and to determine how BMI classifies subjects with different levels of skeletal muscle mass percent (PSMM). The second aim was to determine the prevalence of overweight and obesity status among police trainees (PTs). A total of 103 male PTs participated in this research: age = 21.46 ± 0.64 years, body mass (BM) = 75.97 ± 8.10 kg, body height (BH) = 174.07 ± 6.31 cm, B… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Border guard officers were more likely to have excess fat mass than soldiers from Poland [9] (39% vs. 19%), while the average BMI value was more similar (26.6 vs. 25.6 kg/m 2 ). High prevalence of uniformed force officers with overweight or obesity was also observed in other studies, i.e., among police officers [21,48], soldiers [9,19,20,[22][23][24][25], and firefighters [49]. However, it must be highlighted that using only the BMI classification to verify overweight or obesity, especially in physically active groups may be incorrect due to usual extensive muscle mass [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Border guard officers were more likely to have excess fat mass than soldiers from Poland [9] (39% vs. 19%), while the average BMI value was more similar (26.6 vs. 25.6 kg/m 2 ). High prevalence of uniformed force officers with overweight or obesity was also observed in other studies, i.e., among police officers [21,48], soldiers [9,19,20,[22][23][24][25], and firefighters [49]. However, it must be highlighted that using only the BMI classification to verify overweight or obesity, especially in physically active groups may be incorrect due to usual extensive muscle mass [50].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For obesity, different ranges of body fat percentage (27–38%) were used [ 37 42 ] except for one study [ 36 ] which used BMI as diagnostic criteria. The percentage of body fat index (PBF) has been considered as a more accurate standard than BMI to determine being overweight or obese because it measures body fat directly and BMI does not always reflect the true body fat in our body [ 54 ]. This distinction is particularly significant for sarcopenic elderly individuals, who often exhibit low muscle mass and high body fat while maintaining a seemingly normal BMI [ 13 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thirty-four sources were included in this report. Thirteen sources reported study findings concerning the validity and/or accuracy of BMI as a measure of obesity [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26] and are summarized in Table 2; 13 sources reported findings regarding the use of BMI as a surgical cut-off and are summarized in Table 3; [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] 5 reported ethical issues related to BMI [40][41][42][43][44] and are summarized in Table 4; and 3 guidelines were identified describing recommendations related to the use of BMI as a threshold or cut-off in determining eligibility for surgery (summarized in Table 5). [45][46][47] With regard to validity and/or accuracy, most of the included studies either compared BMI to other measures of obesity and/or adiposity, or investigated the effects of BMI cut-offs for surgical eligibility on surgical outcomes.…”
Section: Annotated Reference List Overall Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%