2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) for assessing steatosis and fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, the true prevalence of undiagnosed fatty liver may have been underestimated due to the lack of sensitivity of ultrasound for distinguishing mild steatosis. When using the CAP, the pooled sensitivity of detecting mild steatosis could be as high as 84% according to a recently published meta-analysis of 61 studies and 10537 included patients [11]. In the present study, 38.0% of the rural cases were identi ed as MAFLD, which is almost two times that reported in a previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, the true prevalence of undiagnosed fatty liver may have been underestimated due to the lack of sensitivity of ultrasound for distinguishing mild steatosis. When using the CAP, the pooled sensitivity of detecting mild steatosis could be as high as 84% according to a recently published meta-analysis of 61 studies and 10537 included patients [11]. In the present study, 38.0% of the rural cases were identi ed as MAFLD, which is almost two times that reported in a previous study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…The M probe was used initially unless the machine indicated the use of the XL probe [10]. Cutoff values applied for CAP and liver stiffness across different grades of steatosis and brosis were derived from a recent meta-analysis as described below [11]: S0 to S3 was de ned as < 244 dB/m 244-264 dB/m; 265-291 dB/m);>292 dB/m, while F0-F1, F2, F3 and F4 was classi ed as < than 8.2kPa, 8.2-9.6 kPa, 9.7-13.5 and > 13.5kPa. CAP of 244 dB/m or greater (≥ S1) were considered as fatty liver and liver stiffness of 9.7 kPa or greater(≥ F3) were considered as advanced brosis.…”
Section: Cap Measurement and Liver Stiffness Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various reference values of CAP and LSM for assessing hepatic steatosis and fibrosis from previous studies. It means that the cut-off values could vary from many factors such as countries, ethnics, statistical methods, underlying clinical characteristics and so on [ 40 42 ]. Further large-scale, prospective studies are required to confirm our results and the effect of managing hepatic steatosis in reducing colorectal tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FibroScan enables simultaneous LS and LF estimation during the same clinical session [ 10 ]. CAP is also recommended as the method of choice for the NAFLD/MAFLD patients for whom a liver biopsy will be necessary for diagnostics, as it is suitable for reliable non-invasive S ≥ S1 and advanced-stage liver fibrosis (F ≥ 3) evaluation [ 36 ]. This is particularly important in light of possible liver biopsy complications and costs and also in light of the poorer CAP performance in the S2 and S3 areas, especially in obese patients [ 7 , 10 , 36 ].…”
Section: Possible Clinical Applicability Of Qnusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAP is also recommended as the method of choice for the NAFLD/MAFLD patients for whom a liver biopsy will be necessary for diagnostics, as it is suitable for reliable non-invasive S ≥ S1 and advanced-stage liver fibrosis (F ≥ 3) evaluation [ 36 ]. This is particularly important in light of possible liver biopsy complications and costs and also in light of the poorer CAP performance in the S2 and S3 areas, especially in obese patients [ 7 , 10 , 36 ]. This method could also be useful for LS monitoring in patients with concurrent NAFLD and AFLD, including those with elevated BMI and DM2, where the risk of disease complications and disease-related mortality is particularly high [ 10 , 37 ].…”
Section: Possible Clinical Applicability Of Qnusmentioning
confidence: 99%