2004
DOI: 10.3733/ca.v058n03p164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of cotton-planting forecasts assessed in the San Joaquin Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The University of California (UC IPM 2004) and the Texas Tech University (Barbato, Seshadri, and Mulligan 2011) have developed digital tools that provide daily recommendations for optimal cotton sowing, using air temperature forecasts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The accuracy of the University of California's cotton planting tool was studied by comparing the temperature forecasts to ground truth measurements from two weather stations (Munier et al 2004). The tool forecasted the correct planting conditions (Kerby, Keeley, and Johnson 1989) 75% of the time, showing that weather forecast models can provide solid sowing recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The University of California (UC IPM 2004) and the Texas Tech University (Barbato, Seshadri, and Mulligan 2011) have developed digital tools that provide daily recommendations for optimal cotton sowing, using air temperature forecasts from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The accuracy of the University of California's cotton planting tool was studied by comparing the temperature forecasts to ground truth measurements from two weather stations (Munier et al 2004). The tool forecasted the correct planting conditions (Kerby, Keeley, and Johnson 1989) 75% of the time, showing that weather forecast models can provide solid sowing recommendations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%