2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Accuracy of interpolation techniques for the derivation of digital elevation models in relation to landform types and data density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
239
0
9

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(255 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
7
239
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…In some situations, there is a need of a brief data pre-processing before the execution of the functions, particularly in DEMs presenting a strong microrelief expression, such as the high resolution ones (CHAPLOT et al, 2006). In these instances, the need for pretreatment comes from the fact that tiny relief imperfections could be considered as saddle points, which has no practical sense.…”
Section: Separating the Hills By A Hydrological Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some situations, there is a need of a brief data pre-processing before the execution of the functions, particularly in DEMs presenting a strong microrelief expression, such as the high resolution ones (CHAPLOT et al, 2006). In these instances, the need for pretreatment comes from the fact that tiny relief imperfections could be considered as saddle points, which has no practical sense.…”
Section: Separating the Hills By A Hydrological Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each grid cell value is the predicted or interpolated elevation at the center or corner of the cell. Digital elevation models are the more commonly used in geographic information systems (GIS) environments because primary derivations, such as slope and aspect, can be easily calculated (Chaplot et al, 2006). Very useful secondary derivations, such as compound topographic index (CTI), specific catchment area, and stream networks can also be derived.…”
Section: Environmental Covariatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were only few differences between the interpolation techniques for high sampling densities while kriging performed best for low sampling densities. For the three mountainous sites located in Laos where high variation of altitude existed, IDW performed better than the other interpolation methods (Chaplot et al, 2006 In order to produce a continuous river surface, cross-sectional data points are interpolated by different interpolation techniques. These techniques often do not account of spatial trends in river bathymetry thus producing inaccurate interpolated surfaces (Merwade, 2009).…”
Section: Errors Due To Interpolation and Sampling Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%